According to a senior Oracle executive, enterprises implementing artificial intelligence (AI) should start by setting a measurable goal and judge success by the improvement the technology brings, rather than by the number of deployed AI agents. This is especially relevant as AI transitions from assisting employees to performing tasks on their behalf.
Natalie Reichelson, Vice President of Application Development at Oracle, told PTI that it is important to remember that the number of deployed agents matters less than the improvements they deliver. She advised business leaders to choose a measurable outcome, such as reducing the time spent correcting accounting errors or decreasing transportation costs.
First and foremost, a baseline must be established so that it can be assessed whether AI has a tangible impact. Next, companies need to properly set up the foundations: ensuring data reliability, clearly defining process ownership, having appropriate control mechanisms, and training employees on working with AI agents. The greatest progress is achieved in parts of the process where work is delayed or requires repeated manual intervention.
The most common misconception among business leaders is that AI is only intended to speed up existing tasks. Reichelson stressed that this is not the case; the true purpose of AI is to rethink the very way work is done. She gave an example: if a process that previously consisted of 10,000 steps is now reduced to five because AI performs all intermediate actions, that is redefining the business process.
Previously, AI tools were mainly used for answering questions, drafting content, and providing recommendations. Modern AI agents are capable of coordinating subsequent steps and performing authorized actions within a business process. For instance, a company aiming to increase its customer retention rate by 2 percent can set this goal, and a team of specialized AI agents can analyze the data, develop a plan, and implement it.
In a hospital system, AI could handle scheduling nurses based on their specializations and shifts. If a nurse falls ill, the system could restructure the schedule and notify those who are supposed to replace her. Quick results are likely to be achieved in routine processes where teams spend a lot of time gathering information and monitoring task completion. In the financial sector, AI agents can help reconcile accounts before closing the books, and in human resources, they can identify potential payroll issues. In supply chains, they can compare delivery options or determine how to allocate scarce materials, with plans undergoing review and approval by teams.
However, humans remain at the center of control, as Reichelson noted. Enterprises must clearly define which actions are permitted for the agent, how its work will be verified, and at what point human approval or intervention is required. Reichelson, who has worked at Oracle for about 15 years, believes that AI represents a more significant shift than the move to cloud computing, although it raises familiar questions. She compared it to the fears surrounding the Y2K bug at the end of the millennium, when 'the world seemed to be coming to an end, and then absolutely nothing happened.'


