Podqi study shows that AIs like ChatGPT and Gemini suggest fake stores for purchases
Read more
Tecnoblog
tecnoblog.net

Podqi study shows that AIs like ChatGPT and Gemini suggest fake stores for purchases

A study conducted by the intellectual property protection company Podqi revealed that generative artificial intelligence tools, such as ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity, can direct users to untrustworthy, inactive, or fraudulent online stores when they seek tips on virtual establishments.

Podqi conducted comprehensive tests involving 151 brands of different sizes (large, medium, and small) in the fashion, beauty, supplements, lifestyle, and furniture sectors. The tests were carried out in September 2026 and consisted of formulating five central questions related to these brands, using the ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity services.

In total, the three tools generated 6,795 responses, citing 4,437 websites or virtual stores. Of the results obtained, 351 addresses were identified as fake, simulating official brands, selling potentially illegal products, or offering low-quality goods.

Additionally, another 367 recommendations led to sites that were suspended, displayed 'coming soon' notices, or simply failed to load. According to Podqi, such domains pose a risk as they can be acquired by third parties and converted into fraudulent commerce platforms.

AI Tool Performance

The results of the Podqi study indicated significant variations in the performance of the AIs. Perplexity showed the worst performance, with 15% of its suggestions pointing to sites that could put the user at risk. ChatGPT came in second place, registering 8% of responses directing to dangerous addresses.

In contrast, the OpenAI service demonstrated greater transparency, generating risk alerts in 24% of its suspicious responses. Gemini achieved third place, recommending risky sites in only 4% of the analyzed cases.

Company Reactions

Google (Gemini), OpenAI (ChatGPT), and Perplexity commented on the findings of the Podqi study, which was initially published by The Verge. Jessica Levis Boord, a Google representative, stated that the company takes information quality seriously and is pleased with Gemini's good performance among those tested. She added that Google constantly works to improve its models and maintains transparency about possible AI errors by providing source links for verification.

Taya Christianson, an OpenAI representative, declared that ChatGPT's goal is to connect people to safe places to shop and that the company continues to refine its safeguards to reduce the appearance of misleading websites in shopping results, thanking researchers for pointing out areas for improvement.

Finally, Jesse Dwyer, a Perplexity representative, highlighted that the platform has consistently been the most accurate AI for reliable reference searches for four years, emphasizing that while it never claims 100% accuracy, it is the only company focused exclusively on this purpose. More details are available in the AI Search Brand Risk Report 2026.

Similar stories

ChatGPT reaches 20% of Google searches, but experts point out important nuances
Read more
tecnoblog.net

ChatGPT reaches 20% of Google searches, but experts point out important nuances

ChatGPT has reached a usage volume corresponding to 20% of searches conducted on Google, according to disclosed data. Many users have started using the artificial intelligence service to ask questions that were previously directed exclusively to Google.

Adam Fry, ChatGPT's product leader, informed Big Technology that OpenAI's AI service registers 1.2 billion weekly active users in the last 60 days, during which 200 million new users were added.

Fry also detailed that ChatGPT's voice mode has 250 million weekly active users and that the tool is used to generate 1.5 billion images per week. He reiterated that the number of queries received by ChatGPT is equivalent to about one-fifth of the total Google searches.

This statistic is considered notable, especially considering that ChatGPT was launched only a year and a half ago, at a time when it did not have updated information, responding to users with messages such as 'I have passed my training period.'

There is a perception that Google faces a real threat, as a service capable of competing with its search engine has emerged. Previously, Bing was the only platform that presented significant competition to Google, but its market share was always modest.

However, there are several aspects that must be analyzed before concluding the end of Google's dominance. The website 9to5Google points out that the source of Google's search volume was not specified. Furthermore, OpenAI's calculation considers every question that triggers a web search as an action equivalent to a search, even if it occurs during a continuous conversation, which allows for different interpretations.

Another point of attention is the uncertainty about how many users ChatGPT has actually diverted from Google. It should be taken into account that Google has its own AI mechanism, Gemini, which may have absorbed part of the search volume, constituting a transfer of usage rather than a direct loss of users.

Additionally, it must be remembered that Google has made its AI Mode available in its search engine for some time. Depending on the measurement methodology, the usage volumes of both services can be presented separately or combined.

The only confirmed certainty is that Google, as a traditional search engine, has never had a competitor as robust as ChatGPT. Fry indicated that OpenAI plans to advance, with one of the next steps being the unification of the Chat and Work modes of the service, given that the current separation generates little understanding among users.

Growth of online trade in South Africa leaves millions of consumers behind during Black Friday
Read more
iol.co.za

Growth of online trade in South Africa leaves millions of consumers behind during Black Friday

Despite a forecast predicting that the South African online retail market will reach 159 billion rand in 2026, most adults in the country still do not make purchases online. The report 'Online Retail in South Africa 2026,' prepared by World Wide Worx in collaboration with Mastercard, Peach Payments, and Ask Afrika, forecasts an annual growth of approximately 22.5%, with online sales expected to account for 10% of total retail turnover throughout the year.

However, consumer research underpinning this report, based on 23,910 surveys conducted in 2025, showed that 79.1% of adults in South Africa use the internet, but only 34.2% make online purchases. Ahead of Black Friday, the digital innovation agency and product consulting firm Specno warns that retailers may compete for the same customers while ignoring the barriers preventing millions of others from making their first purchase.

Joshua Harvey, CEO of Specno, believes this gap must change retailers' approach before November begins. He notes: 'The growing online market may hide how many people are still outside of it.' In his view, sellers should ask themselves whether they are making it easier for anyone to make a first online purchase, or simply offering more discounts to those who already know how to use the function.

The report identified several obstacles to wider participation, including delivery costs, minimum order requirements, unreliable delivery outside major urban centers, payment issues, data costs, and limited support in local languages.

Harvey emphasizes that a new buyer should not have to reach the final screen to find out if delivery is available in their area or what the cost is. Furthermore, if a payment fails, they need a clear answer: whether the transaction went through, if funds were debited, and what to do next. This moment can determine whether the customer trusts and continues the interaction or tries again.

Practical improvements include proactive checking of delivery availability, displaying costs before checkout, explaining payment steps in simple language, and ensuring easy access to help. Where possible, a guest checkout feature can eliminate the need to create an account, which often deters new buyers.

Harvey advises that if retailers aim to make their online sales accessible to millions of new customers across the country, they should test their purchasing journey on basic smartphones using mobile data and intermittent connections before considering increasing spending on campaigns for existing online shoppers. This involves checking whether large images slow down loading, whether promotional pop-ups obscure important information, how complex the forms are to fill out, and whether a connection drop forces the process to start over.

The consulting firm also recommends saving cart contents upon connection loss and providing a reliable way to check order status before retrying payment. Retailers should also analyze at which stage customers abandon the process on different devices and under various connection conditions, and then find out the reasons from users.

The study also questions the assumption that an app should be a priority for every retailer: in 42 out of 48 studied categories, browsers were used more than apps for shopping. Harvey asserts: 'Investments must follow the frequency and nature of customer needs. An app can provide significant convenience to someone who shops regularly, whereas a casual buyer may just need a fast mobile website.'

Harvey believes that Black Friday's effectiveness should also be assessed after the advertising traffic subsides. Accurate delivery promises, useful tracking, accessible support, and clear return procedures determine whether a new buyer returns. Retailers should track how many new customers successfully complete their orders, what support they required, and whether they will make repeat purchases in subsequent months. These metrics can show whether acquisition costs are creating long-term customer relationships.

He concludes: 'Black Friday can attract attention and secure the first sale. The experience that follows determines whether you have earned the customer.' If a package is delayed, tracking is useless and no one answers the query; the discount becomes the least memorable part of the purchase.

For South African retailers, expanding online participation starts with understanding the people whom current purchasing processes do not serve: 'Your next customer may already be online, already know your brand, and already want what you sell. The opportunity lies in removing what prevents them from buying and giving them a reason to return when the discount ends.'

Popular