This Friday, the 13th, marks the end of the last period of retrograde Mercury predicted for 2026. Although astrology enthusiasts attribute this apparent movement to turbulent energetic influences in various spheres of life, science offers a different explanation for what it truly means for the planet to be in retrograde motion.
According to the Old Farmer’s Almanac, a traditional American publication focused on rural astronomy, Mercury showed apparent retrograde motion during certain intervals in 2026. Scientifically, this phenomenon is an optical illusion resulting from Earth's position relative to the planet, as every planet in orbit follows a defined trajectory and does not abruptly reverse its course.
For this reason, the correct term is apparent retrograde motion. Mercury exhibits this characteristic more frequently than other celestial bodies due to its short orbit, which results in an Earth year of only 88 days. Consequently, it appears to move backward in the sky about three or four times annually, with each episode lasting approximately three weeks.
Marcelo Zurita, a columnist for Olhar Digital and president of the Paraíba Astronomy Association (APA), a member of the Brazilian Astronomical Society (SAB), and technical director of the Brazilian Meteor Observation Network (BRAMON), clarifies that for planets with orbits outside Earth's (such as Mars onwards), the most appropriate term is 'retrograde loop.' This occurs because, when overtaken by Earth, these planets appear to form a loop in the sky.
Zurita details that in the case of inner planets, it is Earth that overtakes them in its orbit. Thus, the apparently retrograde motion is observed when these planets circle the Sun behind or in front, at which time a parabola typically forms, not a loop.
Mercury, being the planet closest to the Sun, is characterized by extreme temperatures, varying from 430°C on the illuminated side to -180°C on the night side, in addition to being rocky, lacking an atmosphere, and covered with numerous impact craters, being slightly larger than the Moon and quite similar to it.
Although science has known for years that Mercury is shrinking, specialists are still debating the real dimension of this shrinkage. Researchers from the University of Georgia recently published a paper presenting a new method aimed at measuring this process with greater accuracy.


