AgiBot has introduced LIFE (Learning to Live: A Step Toward Lifelong Embodied Intelligence), a framework designed to allow robots to retain perception and memory across different tasks instead of resetting their state after every operation. The article about this was posted on arXiv on October 30th. The code is available on GitHub under the Apache-2.0 license, and inference codes and weights for RoboBeats models with parameters 0.8B, 2B, and 4B were published on November 3rd. Data for the SSS-Bench evaluation are distributed under the non-commercial CC BY-NC 4.0 license. The models are built on checkpoints from Qwen3.5 of similar size and are hosted on Hugging Face via an individual account linked to the AgiBot repository.
The LIFE framework consists of three components that work together with an agent managed by a multimodal large model. RoboBeats is a lightweight decision-making model that tracks conditions described in natural language regarding what the robot sees. Instead of generating text for every frame, it reads true/false evaluations, where many conditions use the same visual input and cached computations. AgiBot calls this continuous perception 'heartbeat'. Plastic Memory stores raw frames along with structured records in JSON format, allowing for later re-analysis of originals when new questions arise, rather than relying solely on summaries created at the time of the event. The EDM (Explore-Distill-Mount) method transforms working problem-solving methods into verified, reusable tools without needing to update model weights.
The team presented the following results in their scientific paper:
- RoboBeats-2B processes approximately 75 milliseconds per new frame on a single RTX 5090 GPU, and about 77 milliseconds when tracking 16 conditions.
- In the proactive inference task on StreamingBench, RoboBeats-4B increased accuracy from 21.2% to 64.0%.
- On SSS-Bench (171 videos, 618 questions), the accuracy of answering questions using textual memory increased from 40.9% to 60.5%.
- When using EDM tools on 597 test queries in FindingDory, success increased from 37.5% to 65.8%.
As part of a 24-hour study, the AgiBot A3 Ultra robot was used to form daily memory. With six questions asked three times each, using the same answer model, LIFE achieved a score of 29.5 out of 30 with an average response time of 80.6 seconds. This was compared to a result of 28.5 and an average time of 554.7 seconds for the baseline Codex-based model using the same memory.
The team notes that the next step is multi-day online deployment and emphasizes that the results obtained have not yet been independently reproduced. It is also pointed out that the gain on SSS-Bench reflects question-answering accuracy, not memory accuracy.



