Dispute between employee and manager in IT company after overtime sparks public discussion
Read more
Aaj Tak
www.aajtak.in

Dispute between employee and manager in IT company after overtime sparks public discussion

Many office workers encounter situations where, despite their efforts and time invested, they face disapproval from management. Excessive workload often deprives employees of time for personal life and rest. A recent incident that became a topic of discussion on social media concerns a new employee who expressed dissatisfaction with his manager's behavior.

This incident took place at an IT company in the city of Hyderabad. The new employee shared screenshots of correspondence with his manager on the Reddit platform. He stated that he worked continuously for 12 hours, including weekends, but instead of praise, he received reprimands from the senior colleague.

According to the post on Reddit, this employee had started working as a full-time staff member at the company about five months ago. He was involved in a project that required significant effort. Initially, the manager demonstrated a positive attitude and provided assistance with the work. However, recently, a serious technical problem arose in the project, the resolution of which required the employee to work late on Saturday, Sunday, and Monday. The employee, together with the manager, managed to resolve this major issue.

After that, a minor issue remained in the project, which could have been easily resolved the next day. The employee emphasized that this was not a situation that required constant presence at work.

The employee specified that his workday started around 10:00 AM and ended around 10:30 PM, totaling approximately twelve and a half hours of work. He asserted that he completed all necessary tasks assigned by the client. Nevertheless, shortly after logging off, he received a message from the client about a small problem that he could not solve because he had finished his work and logged out. It was over this matter that the manager expressed dissatisfaction and scolded him, stating that he did not expect such behavior from an employee.

The manager's words caused the employee great disappointment. In response, he stated that he cannot be available for work around the clock. He needs time for meals, hygiene routines, and sleep, as well as to maintain his own physical and mental health. He reminded that he had previously sacrificed his personal life for work, including working throughout the weekends and staying up late to solve a critical problem. He added that if his work is evaluated in this manner, he has no further arguments to defend his position. At the same time, the employee noted respect for his manager but stressed that he cannot completely ignore his health and rest.

Following the publication of this story on social media, a discussion began. Some users supported the employee, arguing that office work should never take priority over health and personal life. Others advised the employee not to send angry messages to his manager. They emphasized that the manner of communication in the workplace is very important. One commenter suggested first writing an angry letter or message elsewhere and then editing it using artificial intelligence to give it a more professional tone. Another user recommended having a personal meeting with the manager to avoid further escalation of the situation. Thus, this small workplace conflict sparked a new discussion about the balance between working hours, employee responsibilities, and personal life.

Similar stories

Former Microsoft Employee Starts 30-Day Challenge After Firing Before Diwali
Read more
www.aajtak.in

Former Microsoft Employee Starts 30-Day Challenge After Firing Before Diwali

A former Microsoft employee, Rahul Kaushik, shared his experience on social media after losing his job. He recounted that he learned about the termination only the day after receiving the notice. Currently, Rahul has launched a 30-day challenge aimed at finding a new job with a salary exceeding his previous compensation at Microsoft.

Sharing his ordeal via an Instagram Reels video, Kaushik noted that the news of his dismissal was a major surprise, especially since it occurred right before the Diwali festival. Initially, he believed that his experience working at companies like Amazon and Microsoft would make finding a new role easy; however, he realized the seriousness of the situation the very next day.

Rahul explained in his video that he realized he had lost his job when he was unable to log into the official Microsoft system. He discovered that his corporate email address had also been blocked. Since he had used this account for the past two years, losing access to it was equivalent to acknowledging his termination. Kaushik admitted that it was initially difficult for him to accept the news, and he did not anticipate that his life would change so drastically following the layoffs.

Despite the difficulties, Kaushik decided to face the situation with great resilience. He announced a 30-day challenge during which he intends to find a new position with higher pay than what he earned at Microsoft. As part of this challenge, he plans to regularly send out his resume to new employers and share updates on his job search with his social media followers.

His decision comes at a time when tech professionals are operating in a highly competitive labor market, amid concerns about employment stability and limited opportunities in certain sectors. Kaushik's experience coincides with recent changes in Microsoft's workforce. The company initiated a voluntary separation program for approximately 60,000 employees in India, the US, the UK, and Canada. For eligible employees in India, the program includes payment of one month's basic salary for each full year of service, as well as health insurance and career transition support. The deadline for eligible employees in India to accept this offer is set for December 1, 2026.

Bangalore Startup Implements Work Model Without Attendance Monitoring and Rules
Read more
www.aajtak.in

Bangalore Startup Implements Work Model Without Attendance Monitoring and Rules

A small startup from Bangalore has completely refuted the outdated notion of corporate culture. The audio-social platform FRND, founded in 2019 by two IIT Kanpur graduates, granted its employees complete freedom over their time. This company lacks both a biometric clock-in system and vacation tracking.

The foundation of this culture was laid by IIT Kanpur graduates Bhanu Pratap Singh Tanwar (CEO, Interact Group) and Harshvardhan Chhangani (Co-founder and CPO). Tanwar believes that instead of confining talented specialists within rigid rules, they should be given the freedom to make decisions independently.

Influenced by the famous Netflix book 'No Rules Rules,' Tanwar asserts that the company's philosophy has always been about providing the team with a high degree of autonomy. The goal is to create an environment free from unnecessary restrictions, where people can deliver their best results rather than being tied to a fixed work schedule.

This raises the question of how companies can know that work is being done if there is no record of entry or leave. The answer in this company is extremely simple: only results. Tanwar explains that as an organization, they measure only victories, and when this affects user engagement, the result becomes obvious.

Acknowledging that some individuals might abuse this trust, the company does not tighten rules for everyone. Instead, it evaluates the performance only of those employees who constantly violate the system, gradually removing them from the team.

Experts and research support this model. According to a field experiment published in the British Journal of Industrial Relations, when employees were given the option to choose their own start and end times, their productivity increased by up to 50 percent.

Furthermore, a meta-analysis of over 113 studies conducted in the Journal of Organizational Behavior in 2025 involving more than 88,000 people showed that flexible working hours significantly improve job satisfaction and work-life balance for employees.

Anil Agrawal, Co-founder and CEO of the HR and recruiting service InCruiter, notes that every person has their own way of working, and equating everyone to the same hours assumes that everyone works the same way.

However, Anil Agrawal warns that flexibility should not lead to chaos. If goals and deadlines are not clearly defined, this freedom can lead to longer working days and delays for colleagues. This model may succeed for tech or creative companies with self-motivated talent, but its application will be complex in manufacturing, retail, or fixed-schedule positions.

The future of the office is not about abolishing all rules, but about defining the rules that help people work better and those that merely measure their physical presence. The Bangalore startup has proven that with trust in employees, the office atmosphere not only becomes less stressful but also yields outstanding results.

Railway employee suspended after returning from vacation despite WhatsApp approval
Read more
www.aajtak.in

Railway employee suspended after returning from vacation despite WhatsApp approval

Many employees contact their supervisors via WhatsApp to request leave. Upon receiving an 'OK' reply from the manager, they assume the leave has been approved. However, the question arises: can a simple 'OK' on WhatsApp be considered official leave permission? This issue was raised in connection with the case of a railway employee.

The employee claimed that his senior supervisor had given consent for an additional two-day leave through WhatsApp. Nevertheless, when he returned from vacation, he was suspended from work. He was later also transferred to another position. The employee challenged this decision, but the tribunal rejected his petition.

The tribunal ruled that an 'OK' received on WhatsApp is not, by itself, irrefutable proof that the leave was officially approved.

This incident involves Priya Ranjan Kumar, an employee of the North Central Railway who worked in Prayagraj. According to the employee, he took three days of leave from July 14 to July 16, 2025, to visit his native village. He then messaged his senior supervisor on WhatsApp to extend the leave for July 17 and 18. The employee claimed that the supervisor replied 'OK', which he interpreted as permission for the extra two days off. He also informed another supervisor about this over the phone. However, the railway administration stated that the responsibility for approving the leave during that period lay with another employee. According to the railway, following established procedures was necessary for official leave approval.

The employee stated that when he returned to work on July 21, 2025, he was suspended. Four days later, on July 25, he was transferred from Prayagraj to Fatehpur. Then, on July 31, he was served with a charge sheet related to disciplinary action. The employee appealed his transfer, arguing that the actions against him and the transfer were due to the leave dispute. On the other hand, the railway explained the transfer by stating that a new reception and booking office was being developed at the Fatehpur railway station, and staff were required to work there. The railway cited this administrative necessity as the reason for the transfer.

The Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) in Allahabad stated during the hearing that an 'OK' received on WhatsApp is not sufficient evidence that the competent authority approved the leave. A competent authority is an employee authorized to approve leave according to the rules. The railway side argued that the relevant employee was undergoing training at the time, and another employee with approval authority was handling the department's affairs. The railway also noted that the established official procedure for obtaining leave was not followed.

After considering the railway's arguments, the tribunal concluded that the employee could not prove solely based on the WhatsApp 'OK' that his extended leave had been officially approved.

The employee also claimed that his transfer was not due to routine administrative necessity but was intended as retaliation. However, the railway informed the tribunal that staff were needed for the new booking office in Fatehpur, and the transfer was made for this specific reason. The tribunal accepted this argument from the railway because no convincing evidence was presented that the purpose of the transfer was to punish the employee. Subsequently, the tribunal dismissed the employee's petition on October 7, 2026, upholding the transfer decision.

This case is important for employees who rely solely on WhatsApp messages when extending or obtaining leave approval. Even if a manager replies 'OK', it does not always signify official leave approval, especially if the responding employee lacks the authority to grant leave. Therefore, before extending leave, it is crucial to ensure that the permission is granted by the correct person and that established office procedures are followed. It is also advisable to check approval records in official systems such as the HMRS portal.

Popular