Experimental pancreatic cancer vaccine activates protective cells in 99% of patients
Read more
Olhar Digital
olhardigital.com.br

Experimental pancreatic cancer vaccine activates protective cells in 99% of patients

An experimental vaccine developed against pancreatic cancer managed to elicit an immune response in almost all participants of the clinical trial. This immunolysate, named camupepimut, was created to train the body to recognize seven mutations of the KRAS gene, which are associated with approximately 90% of cases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

The study results were published in the scientific journal Nature Medicine. The research was conducted by scientists affiliated with Mayo Clinic in the United States and aimed to determine whether the vaccine could help eliminate cancer cells that might remain in the body even after surgical intervention and chemotherapy.

Pancreatic cancer is known for its aggressiveness and treatment complexity. One of the main obstacles is the probability of disease recurrence after medical intervention, as cancer cells are capable of rapid spread.

In this context, the goal of the immunolysate is to prepare the immune system to detect specific changes in tumor cells and respond to them.

The phase two study involved 144 patients with pancreatic cancer linked to KRAS mutations. All of them had previously undergone surgery and chemotherapy and showed no detectable signs of the disease at the start of the study.

Participants were randomly divided into two groups: 96 people received the experimental vaccine, while the remaining 48 were monitored without receiving the immunolysate.

The main positive result was achieved regarding the immune response. Nearly 99% of vaccinated patients demonstrated an enhanced T-cell response against KRAS mutations. These cells are a type of white blood cell that plays an important role in protecting the body, including recognizing and fighting abnormal cells.

The response also showed durability. 95.5% of participants still showed detectable T-cell responses against the studied mutations 46 weeks after the start of the study.

However, an important limitation was noted: the vaccine did not show a significant improvement in overall survival without disease progression. In the group that received the immunolysate, this period averaged 23.8 months. Among participants who were only monitored, this figure was 21.2 months. The difference was considered small and statistically insignificant.

Thus, although the vaccine induced a strong immune response, there is currently no sufficient evidence that it reduces the risk of cancer recurrence.

The team also identified some indicators suggesting which patients might benefit most from this strategy. One such factor is circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), small fragments of genetic material released by cancer cells into the bloodstream. Patients who did not have ctDNA detected at the beginning of the study remained disease-free longer after receiving the vaccine compared to those who had these fragments present.

Another observed factor was the administration of radiation therapy. Participants who did not undergo this treatment showed a higher number of lymphocytes, which apparently contributed to the response to the immunolysate.

These results may help researchers improve the vaccine and determine which patients are most likely to respond to the treatment. Ben George, the lead author of the study and an oncologist at Mayo Clinic, told IFL Science that the immune response is an important signal for understanding the biological effects of the vaccine and guiding further tests.

According to him, they managed to induce a powerful response against KRAS mutations in almost all assessed patients. Despite the initial successes, camupepimut still requires further evaluation. Researchers plan to use the data obtained from the phase two trial to improve the immunolysate and develop a larger phase three clinical trial.

The vaccine is not the only experimental strategy being studied against pancreatic cancer. Another approach uses messenger RNA (mRNA) technology to create personalized immunolysates for patients with aggressive forms of the disease.

The need for new alternatives is very high. According to data presented in the article, the global incidence of pancreatic cancer has more than doubled over the last three decades, increasing from approximately 196 thousand new cases in 1990 to over 510 thousand in 2022. While camupepimut represents a promising opportunity to stimulate the body's defense against genetic changes associated with tumors, confirming its clinical benefit will depend on subsequent stages of research.

Similar stories

Theranostics: How the Combination of Diagnostics and Treatment Can Personalize Cancer Treatment Approaches
Read more
super.abril.com.br

Theranostics: How the Combination of Diagnostics and Treatment Can Personalize Cancer Treatment Approaches

Theranostics is a method that combines imaging techniques and targeted cancer treatment. This term originates from the words 'therapy' and 'diagnostics,' and its earliest example is the use of radioactive iodine in thyroid cancer, which began in the 1940s.

Simply put, this approach seeks a biological feature present in large quantities within tumor cells. A molecule capable of recognizing this target binds with a radioactive substance. This allows visualization methods to show exactly where the tumor is located. If the lesions exhibit the desired characteristic and the patient is suitable for treatment, the same characteristic can be used to deliver radiation directly to them.

Significant progress in recent years is due, among other things, to the identification of new targets and the development of radioisotopes suitable for therapy. Besides thyroid cancer, theranostics is already being applied to neuroendocrine tumors and prostate cancer.

Application of PSMA and the Role of Medical Specialists

One of the key targets is PSMA—a protein found in higher amounts in tumor cells than in normal tissues. An MRI scan (PET) can show which lesions uptake the molecule directed at PSMA and with what intensity. In selected patients, the same target can be used to deliver lutetium-177, which emits beta radiation, to the affected areas of the disease.

Marcelo Araujo Queiroz, nuclear medicine and theranostics manager at Einstein Hospital Israelita, explains: 'Today, imaging is an integral part of treatment. And it is not necessary for prostate cancer diagnosis to express PSMA.'

Tumors classified similarly do not necessarily have identical characteristics. Differences can arise even within one person, as some metastases may contain more target marker than others. In addition to determining the presence of the desired characteristic in a lesion, studies are beginning to be used to gather information on whether the intensity of radiopharmaceutical uptake can help predict response to treatment.

Although theranostics is a personalized approach due to the selection of targets and patients, the amount of radioisotope administered in some treatments remains standardized. This is an open question. Queiroz asks: 'Is four cycles enough to deliver the necessary dose to the tumor in some patients? Or will others require eight cycles to achieve the required radiation?'

One possible solution is adjusting the dose based on the actual amount of radiation absorbed by the lesions and healthy tissues of each individual, which is called dosimetry. This assessment is already performed in specialized centers, especially outside Brazil. However, its application to determine the amount of radioactive material administered and the number of treatment cycles has not yet become widespread practice and requires more scientific evidence.

Research and New Directions in Theranostics

Another area of research focuses on combining theranostics with other forms of treatment. Among these possibilities are combination with immunotherapy and targeted therapy, as well as the use of different types of radioisotopes during treatment.

Expanding the capabilities of theranostics is the focus of the Center for Oncology Innovation with emphasis on metals and theranostics (CancerThera) in São Paulo, funded by Fapesp. During the first three years of the project, researchers studied over a thousand patients using imaging to assess the presence of PSMA in various tumors and to test the ability of lesions to uptake molecules directed at this target.

The assessments revealed significant discrepancies not only between patients with the same type of cancer but also between different areas of the disease in the same individual. 'Some tumors demonstrate greater affinity, meaning high marker uptake, in some patients and not in others. This characteristic can also vary between different areas of the tumor,' states the lead researcher and physician-oncologist Carmine Antonio de Souza, Professor at the Faculty of Medical Sciences of the State University of Campinas (FCM/Unicamp).

The results are being analyzed to understand how PSMA can be used beyond prostate cancer. Souza explains that although it was initially described as a marker associated with the prostate, PSMA can also be linked to neoangiogenesis—the process of forming new blood vessels—and can be found in other tumors.

At Einstein Hospital, theranostics is viewed as an assistant throughout the entire patient treatment journey. Marcelo Queiroz reports: 'We have infrastructure specifically focused on this area, with state-of-the-art PET-CT and SPECT-CT equipment, as well as various software for image analysis. We are also starting to implement artificial intelligence tools in this process.'

One question under investigation is how theranostics can be used in earlier stages of cancer. As with the development of other treatments, initial studies usually include patients with advanced disease and limited alternatives. Subsequent studies must evaluate toxicity, determine response, and compare new strategies with already used treatment methods.

According to the Unicamp professor, applying this approach in earlier stages still depends on a deeper understanding of tumor biology, images related to each type of cancer, various tracers, and radiopharmaceuticals that can be used. The researcher also points to collaboration between Brazilian and international centers as one way to accelerate this process.

The availability of radioactive materials is one of the obstacles noted by researchers for expanding theranostics in Brazil. Some of the isotopes used or studied need to be imported, which affects the cost and accessibility of treatment.

One opportunity to reduce external dependence is the Brazilian Multipurpose Reactor (RMB), scheduled to start in 2030 in rural São Paulo. According to Marcelo Queiroz, this facility will increase national production of radioisotopes such as lutetium-177 and ensure greater supply security. He concludes: 'Today, isotopes are imported in Brazil. This reactor could give us autonomy in the production of certain radioactive isotopes.'

The necessary infrastructure goes beyond the availability of radiopharmaceuticals. Patient selection depends on nuclear medicine studies that can show whether the tumor has the desired target. Other examinations may be required after treatment to monitor radiation distribution and its effects.

Targeting treatment to characteristics present in the tumor does not mean that only cancer cells receive radiation. Healthy tissues can also take up some of the radiopharmaceutical. For example, in PSMA-targeted treatment, salivary glands also show uptake, and some patients suffer from xerostomia, characterized by reduced saliva production.

Kidneys and bone marrow are other structures that may require monitoring, depending on the radiopharmaceutical used and the location of the lesions. In the case of treating neuroendocrine tumors with lutetium-DOTATATE, for instance, amino acids may be administered to protect the kidneys, and stimulating urination promotes faster excretion of the radioactive substance.

New immunotherapy shows promising results in treating therapy-resistant tumors
Read more
noticiasaominuto.com

New immunotherapy shows promising results in treating therapy-resistant tumors

An experimental immunotherapy method has shown preliminary signs of activity against tumors that do not respond to other treatments. These results were presented at an international clinical trial conducted by scientists from the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre in Toronto and published today in the scientific journal Nature Medicine.

Lilian Siu, an oncologist and senior researcher from the Canadian center, stated that this study provides the first clinical evidence of the possibility of selectively activating T-cells relevant to tumors and generating anti-tumor activity. She made this statement in a release published by the University Health Network (UHN).

The researcher, who is also a professor of medicine at the University of Toronto, emphasized that the data obtained are preliminary and require confirmation in larger studies, but she considers the responses observed in some patients with limited therapeutic options encouraging.

The first phase of the START001 trial evaluated the experimental drug 'invikafusp alfa'. This drug is designed for the selective stimulation of two subgroups of T-lymphocytes, designated as Vβ6 and Vβ10, which constitute about 10% of immune system cells. According to researchers, this approach aims to concentrate the immune response specifically on cells potentially involved in fighting cancer, while avoiding excessive activation of the entire immune system. However, it has not yet been proven that this method reduces side effects.

Fifty-eight volunteers participated in the study across 10 oncology centers located in Canada, France, Spain, and the United States. The main analysis covered 52 patients with 21 different types of late-stage solid tumors. Among the 27 participants who were assigned doses for further study, four (14.8%) demonstrated an objective response, meaning a sufficient reduction in tumors to meet established clinical criteria.

In the same group, 12 patients (44.4%) recorded some degree of tumor reduction, including cases that did not meet the criteria for classification as an objective response. Regarding 18 patients whose cancers had stopped responding to previous immunotherapies, 12 of them (66.7%) achieved disease control, defined as tumor shrinkage or stabilization.

Positive reactions were noted across various types of cancer, including some forms of colorectal and lung cancer, in situations where existing immunotherapies may have limitations. Researchers also observed selective expansion of target T-lymphocytes in blood and tumors, but they stressed that the small size and diversity of the sample do not allow for definitive conclusions about efficacy, duration of response, or comparative safety.

Phase two of the trial is currently underway and is expected to provide new data on the anti-tumor activity of this treatment. The development of this drug is funded by Marengo Therapeutics, where Lilian Siu serves as a consultant and holds a capital stake.

Popular