Company Founder States Candidate Who Cited Illness Was Hired by Another Firm During the Same Period

When employees face work-related issues, low productivity or carelessness is often blamed. However, one employee from Bangalore put forward a different argument, claiming that the reason for his dismissal was his high salary because it was unprofitable for the company to pay him so much.

Following this, the employee began sharing his distress on social media. The question arose about what an employee should do when the reason for termination is related not to job quality but to salary size. He sought advice from Reddit users.

In his Reddit post, the employee stated that he works as a product manager at a company in Bangalore. He noted that his manager had been replaced only two months prior, and he did not understand why the manager asked him to resign in such a short time.

The employee claimed that the manager started insisting on his departure even before the performance review, citing that his current salary significantly exceeded the team's budget. He emphasized that he was never pointed out any deficiencies in his professional conduct or work results that could serve as grounds for dismissal.

The employee also expressed concern about the timing of the resignation offer. He mentioned that the next payroll period at the company was approaching around October 24th, yet he was already being asked to submit his resignation before that date. He wrote on Reddit that he did not know any reasons why he would have to leave his job.

Furthermore, according to the contract, he was entitled to a two-month notice period. Therefore, he wanted to know what the consequences might be if he did not leave voluntarily, but the company decided to terminate him.

After publishing the post, users began sharing their experiences. Some advised him not to rush into leaving. Others recommended keeping written documentation of conversations with the manager and any requests for resignation, and contacting HR if necessary.

Some users suggested starting a job search while continuing to work at the current place. Others believed that if the company truly wanted to cut costs, it could decide to eliminate a position.

Nevertheless, it should be noted that the advice provided on social media is the personal opinion of the users. The employee's post does not confirm that the company has officially initiated the termination procedure or that he submitted his own resignation. Furthermore, the report lacks any official response from the company.

One employee experiencing significant pressure at work sought advice from Reddit users. He wishes to leave his position, but instead of submitting a resignation, he hopes that the company will terminate his employment. After posting this message on social media, a discussion began about the reasons why some workers prefer to be fired rather than quit voluntarily.

Possible reasons for this choice include workplace stress, the size of the compensation package, and uncertainty regarding finding a new job in the current labor market. The employee shared his problem on the r/QuitCorporate forum on Reddit, asking how to ask his manager to let him go.

In his Reddit post, he described his situation: he works at a large company, but due to increased workload and new responsibilities, he no longer feels peace of mind. It is becoming increasingly difficult for him to meet his boss's expectations. The employee fears how he can meet established deadlines and goals, and he experiences tension before meetings. Furthermore, he worries about the potential negative impact of the current situation on his career.

The employee emphasized that he does not want to resign himself. One reason is the lack of guarantees regarding securing the next job after leaving. Therefore, he is concerned about financial security. He noted that if the company fires him, he might receive a severance package, which would provide him with some financial support and allow him to escape the stressful job. This hope is what led him to discuss possible termination with his manager.

However, according to him, his boss stated that the company's reduction process was complete, and he would have to wait about a year before the next phase began.

In his post, the employee also mentioned that he is willing to accept a lower salary in the future, but his main condition is the absence of excessive work pressure and achieving peace of mind. For him, the priority is not only high income but also the ability to work without constant stress.

After the post appeared, users offered various opinions on the matter. Some advise the employee to consider his options instead of waiting for the company to fire him. Others emphasize the need to find a balance between work and mental health. Nevertheless, it should be noted that this case is based on one employee's post on Reddit.

During job interviews, questions are generally asked regarding the candidate's education, experience, and capability. However, recently a woman shared her experience on social media that an HR representative asked her about her plans to have children after marriage, which made her uncomfortable and sparked a debate on social media.

Shatakshi Dwivedis posted a video on the Instagram platform sharing her interview experience. She described this incident as the most inappropriate question asked by HR.

According to Shatakshi, the interview started normally. The HR asked her where she lived and if she would face any difficulty commuting from home to the office, due to the office distance. Shatakshi stated that she would not have any commuting issues because her husband also worked at the same location, allowing her to come to the office with him. After this, the HR's conversational style changed.

Subsequently, the HR inquired about her marriage. When Shatakshi mentioned that she was recently married, the HR asked her if she was planning to have children soon. Hearing this question, she felt uncomfortable.

Sharing this experience on social media, Shatakshi questioned the stance of companies that talk about women's empowerment and providing equal opportunities to women. Her argument is that while companies talk about advancing women and creating equal opportunities for them, they ask extremely personal questions like marriage and child planning during interviews. Shatakshi did not reveal the name of the company where she was interviewed. However, after her experience became public, many other social media users also shared similar incidents that happened to them during job searches.

As soon as this video appeared on social media, people started giving their opinions. Many women commented that such questions are not limited only to married women; unmarried women are also asked when they plan to get married. One user mentioned that unmarried women are asked about the timing of marriage, married women about the timing of children, and mothers are asked how they will manage work and childcare responsibilities simultaneously.

Another user also shared their experience, stating that they were directly asked about child planning in the interview, and expressed surprise that women are still facing such uncomfortable questions even in 2026. Some users expressed sympathy for Shatakshi's experience and emphasized that the focus in an interview should be on the candidate's qualifications and competence, not on her personal life.

A job interview is a medium to assess a candidate's skills, experience, and suitability for the position. In such cases, questions related to marriage or child planning raise the debate of whether female candidates are being evaluated based on their private lives. This case once again shows the kind of uncomfortable questions working women can face during the job acquisition process. However, since the name of the company where Shatakshi was interviewed has not been disclosed, this incident is based on the experience she shared on social media.