Durban Chamber of Commerce Representatives Inform Ramaphosa About City Port Issues
Read more
IOL
iol.co.za

Durban Chamber of Commerce Representatives Inform Ramaphosa About City Port Issues

The Durban Chamber of Commerce held a gala dinner to mark its 170th anniversary, which resulted in a rare moment of open dialogue between business and government. At the event, President Cyril Ramaphosa met with the General Manager of the Durban Chamber of Commerce, Palaso Phili.

During this event, Ramaphosa advocated for the necessity of a partnership based on mutual trust and responsibility, asserting that South Africa does not need additional consultative forums. He used Durban as an example of successful cooperation, referencing the Presidential Working Group on eThekwini, as well as the recovery from the 2021 unrest and the 2022 floods. Ramaphosa presented a vision of Durban as an attractive center for industrial investment with an efficient port, developing tourism, and a growing manufacturing base, where growth is measured by opportunities for youth, women, people with disabilities, and small businesses.

However, Palaso Phili's response brought the discussion back to practical reality. Her presentation was not merely a list of complaints but an operational report on the state of the local economy. Phili stated that the Port of Durban has fallen into disrepair again. She reported the loss of vessels waiting outside the port for weeks and manufacturers forced to halt production due to a lack of raw materials delayed at the port for over ten days.

Phili emphasized that the problem is not limited to logistics but directly affects employment. She called for support for Transnet Group General Manager Michelle Phillips, diagnosing a structural issue—Transnet's debt of 150 billion rand. She proposed transferring this debt to the National Treasury Department so that Transnet could focus on fixing the port's operations rather than servicing the debt.

A second key point raised by Phili concerned that Durban is the main entry point for cheap imports. Since the Port of Durban is the largest in the country, counterfeit, undervalued, and cheap goods first enter here, negatively impacting local industry. The Chamber works with Ayabonga Khwe, Commissioner of the International Trade Commission (ITAC), but insists on the full application of the International Trade Act 72 of 2002. She warned the president that one cannot speak of reindustrialization while allowing deindustrialization through the port.

Finally, Phili presented statistics on the development gap for small and medium enterprises (SMEs). In Brazil and China, SMEs account for about 80% of the workforce, whereas in South Africa, this figure is only around 40%. She reframed traditional barriers—issues with electricity, infrastructure, rent, access to finance, and labor laws—as evidence of the failure of the national employment strategy. She noted that Durban can become a city of opportunity only with the participation of not just large businesses.

Partnership That Must Deliver Results

The significance of the evening was not the celebration itself, but the agreement reached. Phili stated that private investors are ready to help restore the port, and both leaders appeared to agree with the diagnosis presented. The president stated that the eThekwini model should serve as a benchmark for the entire country, and the general manager expressed readiness to work 'shoulder to shoulder' with his office.

Against the backdrop of upcoming local elections, it became clear that the Durban business community is not asking for favors. It demands a functioning port, fair adherence to trade rules, and an environment conducive to small business growth. The Chamber has survived 170 years through adaptation, and last week its leadership demonstrated that it continues to adapt, transforming from a lobbying group into an organized problem-solving partner.

Now, the question, as Phili noted, is whether the partnership Ramaphosa spoke of can go beyond empty words. Apparently, the Chamber has done its part by presenting its problems. Now the entire country will be watching what happens to its port, factories, and small businesses.

Similar stories

Conflict over Raihan Vadra's exhibition at Bikaner House: Dispute over censorship of protest photos
Read more
timesofindia.indiatimes.com

Conflict over Raihan Vadra's exhibition at Bikaner House: Dispute over censorship of protest photos

A scandal erupted at Bikaner House in Delhi after artist and photographer Raihan Vadra, son of Congress leader Priyanka Gandhi Vadra and businessman Robert Vadra, stated that the venue management demanded the removal of about 74 photographs documenting recent youth protests before the opening of his solo exhibition, 'No Idea Is Final.'

Raihan also reported that he was asked to remove two pictures of the Indian flag, which he refused. According to PTI, the exhibition opened on schedule on Wednesday, with about 40 photographs remaining on display, while more than 70 were removed. The exhibition, featuring wildlife, abstract works, and images of recent youth movements, will run until Sunday.

In an Instagram post, Raihan wrote that 'Five hours ago, the management of Bikaner House forced me to remove most of the artwork presented in my exhibition 'No Idea Is Final,' which opens tonight at 7 PM. The photos related to youth protests in Delhi. Apparently, the content was deemed 'unacceptable.' Furthermore, they asked me to remove two pictures of the Tiranga. I refused. I will not remove the image of the Indian flag.'

Reasons for photo removal

Raihan told PTI that the management objected to the 'political nature' of the protest photographs. He was informed at 3:30 PM on Wednesday that the images had to be removed by 5:00 PM, or the exhibition would be canceled. According to Raihan, the administration stated that it was not the time to display these images in the current political climate in India. He insisted that the photographs did not carry a political message but merely documented protests over the past six months.

He told PTI: 'I consider it my duty as an Indian artist, and not just because I am currently holding an exhibition, but because it is my duty as an Indian artist to document what is happening... They are censoring artists' work; I don't know what they are afraid of. They even went so far as to ask for the removal of a picture of the Indian flag.' Raihan also noted that he had provided the management with the project and layout of the exhibition in advance and objected to the removal of almost half the works less than 24 hours before the opening.

An official spokesperson for Bikaner House told PTI that the administration was not authorized to comment on the matter.

Reaction from Priyanka Gandhi and Congress leaders

Priyanka Gandhi Vadra criticized the alleged removal of photographs, calling it an attempt to silence the voices of the youth. She told PTI: 'I think it is ridiculous. What do you think? He is a young boy, but I suppose you know they are silencing the voice of the youth across the country. So it is expected that they would do this to anyone.'

She added: 'His protest photos, not a single comment, not anything that would offend anyone, are simply visual documentation of the protest. So, I mean, obviously that's how they think. This is no longer democracy. Today it is him, tomorrow it will be another artist.'

Senior Congress leader Pawan Khera also condemned the alleged censorship, questioning why photographs documenting protests were deemed unacceptable. He wrote: 'When even the Tricolour is not safe from the censor's scissors, perhaps the problem is not with art. The problem is with the regime. Just a few hours before @raihanrvadra was supposed to open his art exhibition 'No Idea Is Final,' 74 pieces of art—almost half the exhibition—were taken down as 'political' by Bikaner House. The photos simply documented protests, and none of them were offensive or provocative. So, what exactly was the violation?'

Khera also asserted that among the works Raihan was supposed to defend was a photograph of the Tricolour. Congress MP Kartikeya Chidambaram also condemned the alleged censorship, calling the administration's behavior 'stupid' and 'rude.' The legal wing of the Indian Youth Congress also reacted to the scandal, posting on X: 'IYC Legal Wing: YOU CAN CENSOR THE FRAME. NOT THE TRUTH. SAHEB DARA HUA HE.'

Raihan stated that the exhibition will continue with the works that remain on display and noted that if necessary, he can find another venue to show the full collection of protest photographs.

Popular