Gauteng Government Intensifies Fight Against Gender-Based Violence, Deploying Response Teams to High-Risk Areas
Read more
IOL
iol.co.za

Gauteng Government Intensifies Fight Against Gender-Based Violence, Deploying Response Teams to High-Risk Areas

The head of the Gauteng province, Panyisa Letsufi, presented plans to deploy 1022 response teams for gender-based violence (GBV) cases across 122 high-risk districts. These measures are part of the provincial government's efforts to combat violence against women and children.

Speaking on the province's response to President Cyril Ramaphosa's directives regarding gender-based violence and femicide (GBVF) on Sunday, November 1st, Letsufi stated that the intervention would also include engaging additional social workers, strengthening specialized courts, and improving victim support services.

These steps form part of Gauteng's 90-day intervention program aimed at addressing the GBVF crisis in the province, which includes unsolved assault and murder cases, delays in forensic examinations, and inadequate safety measures.

Letsufi acknowledged the seriousness of the situation and the province's responsibility to resolve it, stating: 'Gauteng bears a significant share of our nation's gender-based violence and femicide crisis, and we fully accept our duty to act.'

Targeted Intervention in Police Stations with High Rates of Rape

The provincial government has identified ten police stations recording the highest number of rape cases for additional intervention. These stations include Rietgat, Alexandria, Mameloedi, Dipsluit, Ivory Park, Dobsonville, Midrand, and Tembisa.

The intervention plan involves placing 1022 GBV teams in 122 high-risk areas and adding 56 social workers to enhance support for victims and survivors. Furthermore, the province plans to strengthen seven specialized sexual offense courts and 144 victim-friendly facilities to improve the handling of cases involving women and children.

It is also expected that 19 Gauteng medico-legal clinics will play a role in protecting forensic evidence and supporting criminal investigations. These measures follow Ramaphosa's address of September 29th, in which he instructed authorities to expedite investigations into unsolved murders, attempted murders, rapes, and serious sexual offenses involving women and children.

Strengthening Shelters and Survivor Support in Gauteng

Letsufi also reported that the provincial government has expanded measures to provide protection and assistance to GBV survivors. Currently, 18 shelters operate in the province, providing 363 beds, along with seven Tutuzela Care Centers.

Psychosocial support services have been provided to tens of thousands of people over the past six months, and new referral tools have been implemented in all 43 protection order courts. Visible police activity has also been increased in high-risk areas, and technical issues with the 'e-Panic Button' application have been resolved.

As part of efforts to enhance public safety while maintaining survivor confidentiality, the province has expanded integrated video surveillance networks.

Despite the actions taken, Letsufi noted that the province still has many tasks ahead. Of the 67 directives in five priority areas, only 21 have been fully implemented, while 38 are in progress, and eight have not yet started.

These five areas include recovering unsolved criminal cases, eliminating forensic examination backlogs, increasing women's safety in public spaces, combating alcohol-related violence, and enhancing survivor support.

Letsufi emphasized: 'Despite the progress made, challenges remain, particularly the forensic examination backlog, information on recovering unsolved cases, and the need to accelerate municipal safety measures.' He added that the province is also prioritizing improved coordination, accountability, and timely execution of remaining directives.

The provincial head stated that the government will continue to monitor implementation through weekly meetings and progress reports, stressing: 'Protecting our women and children is an absolute priority requiring immediate action, because injustice delayed is not justice at all.'

Similar stories

Service delivery crisis in Gauteng questions province's appeal amid rising prices in Cape Town
Read more
iol.co.za

Service delivery crisis in Gauteng questions province's appeal amid rising prices in Cape Town

Local elections on November 4 might give Gauteng residents reason to reconsider moving to Cape Town if political changes lead to tangible improvements in municipal governance.

According to Stats SA estimates, between 2021 and 2026, Gauteng attracted the largest influx of interprovincial migrants in the country—about 1.42 million people, compared to 500,093 in the Western Cape. Gauteng's population is approximately 16.3 million, accounting for 25.7% of South Africa's total population of 63.52 million, making it the most populous province in the country according to Statistics South Africa data.

However, poor municipal service delivery in Gauteng, including Johannesburg, and low quality of services have negatively affected the interest of property buyers and investors, according to Renier Kriek, managing director of the alternative housing finance company Sentinel Homes. The Centre for Development and Entrepreneurship warned that unpaid client bills in Johannesburg reached nearly 72 billion rand, describing a cycle where unreliable services reduce clients' willingness or ability to pay, weakening revenue available for servicing and investment.

Kriek notes: 'When basic services such as water, electricity, or waste removal cannot be guaranteed, it affects sentiment in the housing market and property prices.' Conversely, Cape Town, according to Kriek, has seen a significant influx of new residents due to higher quality service provision. However, the city's reluctance to quickly allocate land and fast-track project approvals has led to a housing shortage and sharp price increases.

The real estate firm Lightstone found that the Western Cape was the only province to record a net increase in sellers over buyers in the last five years. Nevertheless, its analysis also showed that in 2025, the Western Cape attracted fewer residents in the price range above R500,000 than in previous years. Gauteng appears to have lost the fewest residents since 2021—a shift that Lightstone partially attributes to rising prices and accessibility issues in Cape Town, reduced remote work opportunities, and relatively attractive property prices in Gauteng.

Kriek argues that the emerging affordability crisis may prompt more households to consider Gauteng or convince potential migrants not to leave at all. He emphasizes: 'Tangible improvements in Gauteng can change calculations for households considering a move. Cape Town cannot rely on Johannesburg remaining broken, nor can it expect good services to indefinitely compensate for exorbitant housing costs.'

According to Kriek, the South African Municipal Association and most leading analysts anticipate more coalition governments after the elections. He believes that winning the election, forming a governing majority, and managing the municipality are separate hurdles that must be overcome. Kriek warns that election winners cannot achieve change overnight, as public sentiment regarding lack of progress always precedes any improvements that require time to materialize, and this can influence the rise or fall of property prices and investments.

Kriek explains that when investing in property, one is effectively acquiring a stake in the municipality that manages everything outside their front door. He adds: 'Capital has a choice; poor municipal conditions increase costs and uncertainty. Investors and homebuyers react to this by closing deals at lower prices, demanding higher returns, or taking their money elsewhere. Strong renter demand can still make a deal worthwhile—but municipal risk is always factored into the price.'

A poorly managed municipality can make buying a home initially cheaper but more expensive in the long run. Households paying a lower purchase price may still be forced to independently arrange for water storage, backup power, and security on top of existing pressures on South African households. Furthermore, Kriek warns that falling property prices do not automatically mean more affordable housing.

He points out that the supply shortage is the primary driver of irrational and unsustainable price growth, making housing unaffordable for people in large metropolises, especially in Cape Town. In his view, 'the political failure is allowing this artificial shortage to persist.' Kriek adds that the serious deficiency in state infrastructure across the country, particularly public transport, exacerbates the problem. As urban nodes become denser, reliance on cars and private minivans becomes increasingly irrational.

Kriek concludes that South Africa has entered a phase where coalition politics has become the norm. This new era could provide a better balance in municipal governance and a more diverse pool of leaders to introduce new ideas. The most important evidence to watch is practical aspects: funded infrastructure works, more reliable services, faster project approvals, and actual completion of housing construction. He calls for: 'We need innovative policies and processes for rapid land allocation and project approval, improved service delivery, and accelerated affordable housing initiatives, and we must hold our new leaders accountable for their results, good or bad.' He concludes with: 'Gauteng's opportunity is to give people reasons to stay. Cape Town's task is to make room for those who want to come.'

Popular