Social media discussion about RAC ticket issuance: DRM explained seat allocation rules
Read more
Aaj Tak
www.aajtak.in

Social media discussion about RAC ticket issuance: DRM explained seat allocation rules

Discussions continue on social media regarding RAC class seats, which are often found on trains. Users express the opinion that if a passenger has paid the full fare, they should not be issued an RAC ticket instead of a guaranteed seat. With the RAC system, two passengers are forced to travel on the same berth.

A recent viral post on social media concerned this system, claiming that after paying the full fare, the passenger is only provided half a seat. In such cases, users demand either a discount on the fare or a full refund if a confirmed seat cannot be obtained.

Specifically, one passenger raised this issue on the X platform, expressing dissatisfaction that they were allocated an AC seat despite full payment. They requested assurance of a confirmed seat as soon as possible.

DRM (Mumbai Central, Western Railway) responded to this post, explaining that RAC seats are distributed among passengers based on availability if other passengers cancel their tickets or do not board the train. They also noted that the Train Ticket Examiner (TTE) allocates vacant seats according to passenger priorities on board. The railway company stated that the relevant TTE had been notified to assist the passenger.

Following the railway's response, many users called on Indian Railways to review the RAC system. They believe that sharing one berth between two strangers creates inconvenience and violates privacy, especially for female passengers. Users demanded either confirmation of the entire berth or a full refund in case of ticket cancellation. It was also suggested that at least fifty percent of the cost should be refunded if an RAC ticket is issued.

Furthermore, some passengers criticized the practice of issuing tickets by TTEs, arguing that this system should be abolished. In their view, TTEs prefer to give seats to general class passengers instead of allocating vacant seats for RAC passengers. One user also reported that some TTEs demand an extra fee for finding vacant seats, giving the passengers a receipt in return.

Similar stories

Passengers May Not Receive Seats on Trains Even With Confirmed Tickets: Reasons and Compensation
Read more
www.aajtak.in

Passengers May Not Receive Seats on Trains Even With Confirmed Tickets: Reasons and Compensation

When purchasing train tickets, everyone aims to receive a confirmed ticket on time, as this guarantees a seat for a comfortable journey. However, sometimes passengers encounter a situation where they are not provided with a seat despite having a confirmed ticket. Such cases have occurred repeatedly, and in some instances, the railway has been forced to pay compensation.

There are several reasons why passengers might not receive their seats. One of them is the occupation of the seat by other people. Although this happens rarely, someone sometimes occupies your seat and refuses to vacate it. If the police do not assist, the passenger remains without a seat.

Several months ago, in May 2026, the Consumer Protection Commission of Bhojpur district in Bihar ruled that the railway must compensate passengers in such cases. According to media reports, the incident occurred on the LTT-Patana express traveling from Mumbai Lokmanya Tilak Terminus to Patna. Four passengers purchased confirmed tickets in Third AC class for a trip from Vindhyachal to Ara. Upon boarding, they discovered that people who allegedly identified themselves as railway employees were sitting in their reserved seats.

The passengers tried to ask them to vacate their seats but were unsuccessful. According to the complaint, they were not assisted on the train and ultimately had to travel standing up. The commission found the railway responsible for inadequate service and ordered the refund of ticket costs with interest, as well as compensation of 20 thousand rupees and 15 thousand rupees to cover legal expenses.

Another scenario arises during holidays when there is an excessive crowd. Due to the huge number of passengers, confirmed tickets may become useless as passengers cannot reach their seats. In another case, which happened in July 2026, the Consumer Protection Commission of Pallackad district in Kerala held the railway responsible for inadequate service due to overcrowding in the reserved carriage and the inability of passengers to reach their confirmed seats on the Kanyakumari-Pune express.

In this case, the commission ruled to pay 50 thousand rupees in compensation and 25 thousand rupees to cover legal costs.

It also happens that one of the train carriages has to be detached due to technical reasons. In such a situation, even with a confirmed ticket, a passenger may be left without a seat. The railway must arrange alternative accommodation for the passengers of that carriage. If sufficient space is not provided, passengers may face difficulties. In 2012, a case was registered where an RAC ticket was converted to waiting list, after which the court granted compensation.

It is important to note that such situations occur quite rarely. As a rule, the railway provides seats for passengers with confirmed tickets. If such a situation occurs due to the fault of the railway, the passenger can file a complaint. First, they should contact the conductor, presenting their ticket, carriage number, and seat number. A complaint can also be filed through the official railway hotline number 139 or via the RailMadad platform. In the event of no seat, reimbursement of the travel cost may be possible.

Popular