The country is preparing to promote ethanol as an alternative to gasoline. The government recently introduced changes to the rules allowing the operation of flexible fuel vehicles capable of running on 100% ethanol. However, this decision has raised a serious question: how will such a large quantity of fuel be ensured in the country if cars begin to switch entirely to ethanol?
The Supreme Court also highlighted the need to consider the interests of farmers when discussing ethanol policy.
During hearings related to ethanol last Thursday, the Supreme Court requested clarification from the central government regarding the provision of sufficient fuel for vehicles that will operate exclusively on 100% ethanol.
Judges M.M. Sundares and Prasanna B. Varale, citing recent media reports, mentioned that newspapers had published information about the government's permission for using 100% ethanol vehicles. They emphasized that it is crucial to understand how the supply of ethanol for such a large number of vehicles will be managed.
In response to the court's query, Attorney General R. Venkataramani stated that this would require a massive overhaul of production and manufacturing systems. He noted that if the use of 100% ethanol vehicles increases in the future, the country must prepare on a large scale.
During the session, the Supreme Court pointed out the necessity of linking ethanol policy not only to fuel and environmental issues but also to the interests of farmers. Judge Sundares stressed that this situation must be viewed from the perspective of benefit to ordinary citizens, and that the aspect of strengthening the country's farmers is extremely important alongside ecology.
He added that a significant portion of the country's population still lives in rural areas, and the issue of strengthening farmers is not sufficiently covered. The bench stated the need to support broad segments of the population, especially residents of rural areas.
The Attorney General assured that he would take into account the aspects related to farmers in his arguments. One lawyer present at the hearing stated that promoting ethanol would benefit farmers in one way or another. Another lawyer countered that the current central government policy already includes the interests of farmers.
The Supreme Court scheduled the next hearing on this matter for next month.
This issue arose during the consideration of petitions concerning the distribution of ethanol for the ESY 2025-26 period. Previously, on June 30, the Supreme Court ordered the status quo to be maintained regarding the High Court of Karnataka's ruling, which required consideration of increasing ethanol supplies. This was because a petroleum trading company filed a lawsuit with the Supreme Court, claiming that the High Court's ruling could affect the policy of blending 20% ethanol in gasoline.
The Ministry of Transport and Road Affairs issued a notification on October 26, 2026, regarding the amendment of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules of 1989. These changes paved the way for flexible fuel vehicles capable of running on E100, meaning nearly pure ethanol. This implies that the number of such vehicles running on pure ethanol will increase in the country in the future.
Previously, the ministry also changed rules concerning vehicle emission certification, including E100 alongside E85. E85 fuel consists of 85% ethanol and 15% gasoline, whereas E100 contains almost entirely ethanol. Flexible fuel vehicles are designed to run on fuels with a higher ethanol content than regular gasoline. Nevertheless, their engines and fuel systems undergo certain modifications compared to standard gasoline cars.


