Desible.ai Founders Discuss Voice AI Business Model in Banking and Insurance Sectors
Read more
YourStory [india, en]
yourstory.com

Desible.ai Founders Discuss Voice AI Business Model in Banking and Insurance Sectors

In the Prime Venture Partners Podcast, Desible.ai founders Uttam Tiwari and Omkar Raikar discussed what is necessary to create and sell agentic AI in the Indian BFSI sector. They covered topics ranging from product engineering and regulatory compliance to enterprise sales and scaling beyond the initial use case.

The cost of voice AI is rapidly decreasing, dropping from 7 rupees per minute to less than 2 rupees. However, Uttam Tiwari and Omkar Raikar believe that the true opportunity lies not just in dialogues, but in automating workflows that operate within large enterprises.

Creating a voice agent that sounds natural is no longer the most difficult task. The much harder challenge is ensuring that such an agent functions reliably inside a bank or insurance company, including adhering to regulatory requirements, integrating with legacy systems, and achieving measurable business outcomes.

For Uttam Tiwari and Omkar Raikar, co-founders of Desible.ai, this distinction defines their company's strategy. Desible develops an orchestration platform for agentic workflows for regulated enterprises, starting with a focus on insurance.

In a conversation with Gaurav Ranjan, Senior Partner at Prime Venture Partners, the founders talked about the reasons for frequent failures of AI pilot projects when transitioning to production environments, changes in corporate procurement behavior, and how the economics of voice AI can fundamentally change the contact center industry.

Uttam and Omkar have known each other for 17 years. Their previous venture, Business Toys, was acquired in 2023. Since then, they have worked with American companies such as Newsweek, Bank of America, and Nestlé, providing software and AI consulting services.

A turning point was a logistics brokerage project that involved using AI to call truck drivers to check availability and verify information. After implementation, the client reduced its contact center from approximately 20–25 people down to just three. This experience demonstrated the potential of voice AI to transform enterprise operations.

However, while exploring the Indian market through proof-of-concept projects with 12–13 enterprises, the founders realized that automating conversations alone would not create a sufficiently differentiated business.

Uttam explained: 'Voice is a commodity. I agree, but workflows are not, because a workflow is deeply integrated into organizational processes, and that is where you get the moat.' This realization prompted Desible to focus on insurance, where customer conversations are closely linked to renewal, retention, claims, sales, and service processes.

One of the most telling discussions concerned the difference between demonstrating AI capabilities and their actual deployment in regulated organizations. Uttam estimates that the conversion rate from proof-of-concepts to production deployments among the companies he observed is less than 35–40%. He argues that a successful demonstration is only the beginning of a much more complex journey.

Insurance companies require vendors to satisfy the demands of business teams, technology departments, information security departments, compliance functions, and senior technology leadership before allowing system deployment into production.

Omkar described Indian information security audits, which include around 450 questions, including requirements related to data residency and computing infrastructure. Even established international technology providers can struggle to meet these requirements.

Consequently, Desible directed a significant portion of its initial funding toward building a compliance-ready infrastructure, rather than focusing exclusively on voice capabilities.

For Omkar, consistency is critically important, as insurance conversations leave almost no room for improvisation. He emphasized: 'You need to speak the same boring language every time, staying within compliance.'

Technical challenges go beyond compliance. Voice agents must be able to handle interruptions, understand multilingual dialogues, extract information from corporate systems, and respond appropriately without losing context.

Omkar gave an example of how an AI agent conducting a medical survey must recognize a customer interruption before hearing the full question. In another scenario, the system must identify a mentioned medication, check it against a database, and ask a relevant follow-up question. These capabilities distinguish a production-ready system from a mere conversational demo.

The pricing of voice AI has undergone sharp changes. As Gaurav noted, traditional human-staffed contact center operations can cost around 20–30 rupees per minute, whereas early voice AI solutions cost 5–7 rupees per minute. Competitive prices have since dropped to approximately 1.5–3 rupees per minute.

For startups developing voice AI products, this raises an awkward question: if the core technology becomes cheaper, how do they capture a significant share of the value they create?

Omkar countered that per-minute pricing was never a natural economic model for contact centers, which historically charged based on headcount or seats. The advent of voice AI introduced a pricing structure based on infrastructure and API consumption.

Desible is trying to move beyond this model by charging for workflow completion rather than treating every call as an isolated transaction. According to Omkar, the company processes nearly a million calls daily, and thanks to its orchestration capabilities, it has managed to reduce internal call handling costs from approximately 7–8 rupees previously used to below 1.5–2 rupees.

Nevertheless, the founders admit that corporate clients are still assessing whether AI delivers sustainable returns. Uttam shared an example of a client who did not renew a contract for three small regional contact centers after the Desible solution had been running for about four and a half months.

He warned that the overall transition remains gradual, as enterprises require sustained operational proof before reallocating budgets.

A year ago, corporate clients primarily evaluated voice AI based on metrics like latency, tone, language switching, and how natural the agent sounded. Today, Uttam explained, clients increasingly compare AI systems directly with human employees based on criteria such as availability, conversion rates, lead qualification, and accuracy of information recorded after calls.

The shift from technological novelty to measurable operational performance is also changing Desible's approach to enterprise sales. Instead of chasing every potential AI experiment, the company prioritizes workflows that already exist within the organization. Such processes have established owners, operating procedures, budgets, and key performance indicators, which simplifies demonstrating the value of automation.

Uttam cautioned: 'Your champion may not be your buyer.' A business leader enthusiastic about an AI pilot project may not have the authority to approve implementation. Information security, technology, compliance, and procurement teams can influence the final decision.

For founders selling enterprise AI, identifying these stakeholders early can be as crucial as product development itself.

Perhaps the most striking observation arose when Gaurav asked whether enterprise sales constituted 40% of the product and 60% of navigating internal organizational dynamics. Omkar suggested that in India, the latter could account for up to 80%. He argued that even a technically superior product can fail if the decision-making structures are not understood, internal support is not secured, and relationships with multiple stakeholders are not maintained.

Desible's expansion strategy illustrates this approach. At one insurance company, the company started with managing the sales funnel and then expanded to greeting calls, retention, and inbound customer service. Each successful workflow builds additional trust and reduces the effort required for subsequent integrations. Only in the area of insurance renewals has the company identified over 20 different workflows.

The founders believe that this combination of industry specialization, regulatory readiness, and integration into existing corporate processes creates a more long-term advantage than voice quality alone.

Despite high competition in voice AI, Omkar believes the market remains underexplored, especially in India, where numerous languages, dialects, background noise, and frequent language switching make conversational systems significantly more complex. He believes that companies solving these problems at scale can become global leaders.

However, Desible's long-term ambitions extend beyond call handling. The founders envision an orchestration platform that supports insurance companies and intermediaries, including third-party administrators, brokers, and health aggregators, across all their operational workflows. The ultimate measure of success will not be how convincingly the AI agent speaks, but whether it helps enterprises make better decisions, improve customer outcomes, and operate more efficiently.

Uttam's assessment of the current industry state reflects a central lesson for AI founders: 'POC is overrated, and production is underrated.'

As enterprises move from AI experimentation to demanding measurable results, the winners may not be the companies with the most impressive demonstrations, but those capable of transforming AI into reliable infrastructure for daily business operations.

Similar stories

Vijay Subramaniam discusses the impact of artificial intelligence on the changing media landscape
Read more
yourstory.com

Vijay Subramaniam discusses the impact of artificial intelligence on the changing media landscape

The media industry has long functioned in isolated segments: agencies managed stars, studios created films, platforms distributed content, and brands paid for audience reach. However, these boundaries are blurring today. Creators are building their own enterprises, artificial intelligence is transforming the content creation process, and one story or character can become the starting point for films, series, and brand partnerships.

Collective Artists Network, founded by Vijay Subramaniam, operates in several such areas. During a fireside chat titled 'The Great Media Repackaging: Why Content, Talent, Technology, and Commerce Are Merging at TechSparks 2026,' Subramaniam discussed how his project integrates layers in communities of talent, marketing, and technology, as well as the role of AI in this overall scheme.

Having earned the nickname 'the AI man in the media industry,' Subramaniam stated that despite concerns, he confidently embraces this role because technology will remain here forever. He expressed the conviction that content creation should be equal in opportunity. Historically, only a few elites had the right to tell stories, but in his opinion, anyone who has a story should have the ability to tell and consume it. His company actively implements this idea, possessing, according to him, the world's largest portfolio of AI-enhanced content.

According to Subramaniam, the media business is recession-proof. He noted that during the COVID-19 pandemic, everyone was forced to stay home to consume content, meaning media risks losing nothing. The risk exists for media operators who fail to adapt to changes.

He also pointed out that the Indian media ecosystem is experiencing a decline of oligarchs for the first time. Citing successful post-pandemic projects like KGF, Mahavatar Narsimha, and Netflix shows, including the recently released Musafir Cafe, which became a Netflix hit, he emphasized that success is achieved by new faces and fresh talent, not by people who have controlled the industry for decades. He believes that these newcomers will prevail.

Regarding whether AI makes content cheaper and more profitable, Subramaniam answered affirmatively. He stated that business profitability will increase by two hundred percent, and storytelling will become democratic, allowing stories to be created from anywhere, such as Jabalpur or Coimbatore. However, he warned that this is not just about writing a prompt and getting 'AI sludge'; the same principles as in animation are required: production designer, costume artist, cinematographer. He added that AI will never replace a screenwriter and dialogue, as there must always be a person behind the project capable of conveying the director's vision.

The company built its tool G5 by working with four National Award-winning directors: Rajesh Mapushkar (for the film Ventilator), Hansal Mehta, Sanjay Puran Singh Chauhan, and Manu Anand. These directors defined what should be in the product, and this is being implemented in the current development.

Speaking about a fully AI-generated animated and visual series about the Mahabharata, set to release at the end of 2025, Subramaniam admitted that lessons were learned from the first release. He reported that they are proud to be the first in the world in this field, and thanks to technological improvements starting next month, viewers will see enhancements: the content now includes emotion, comedic timing, as well as genuine stress, grief, and other expressions.

Although creators' economies are rapidly evolving thanks to AI, new business models, and direct sales channels, the industry faces a question: what will determine success in the next five years—talent, stories, or access to the audience? For Vijay Subramaniam, the answer lies in recognizing that the audience is becoming increasingly unpredictable. He noted that any formula they try to use is inevitably broken.

Examples like Musafir Cafe challenge the belief that big-budget streaming shows must match the scale of Game of Thrones or House of the Dragon. Similarly, the success of films like Dhurandhar refutes the notion that audiences will not dedicate time to theatrical releases. In a situation where established formulas offer little guarantee, Subramaniam believes that the fundamentals of a successful creative business remain the same: finding the best storytellers, providing them with the necessary resources, and ensuring economic viability.

Startup PeakVision AI offers an alternative approach to implementing artificial intelligence in the corporate sector
Read more
technode.com

Startup PeakVision AI offers an alternative approach to implementing artificial intelligence in the corporate sector

For companies implementing artificial intelligence, key questions are not only about choosing a model but also about where the AI operates, its cost, and the ability to keep confidential data under the company's control. PeakVision AI offers a solution that involves moving most of the AI tasks inside the enterprise.

The company's system considers the task, rather than an individual application, as the main unit of work: users state a goal, and AI agents perform the necessary steps in a local computing environment. Co-founder and CTO Liangyu Nie told TechNode that PeakVision AI was founded in 2024, overcoming two major obstacles to AI adoption in corporations: the complexity of technology deployment and concerns over data security.

In March 2026, the company opened its headquarters in Hangzhou and received government support for research and development amounting to 15 million yuan. In May, it presented its first enterprise systems and completed an initial funding round, followed by a second round worth tens of millions of yuan in August.

PeakVision AI creates an enterprise AI stack that integrates locally deployed computing, FengKan AIOS, and AI agent services. This system is designed to focus on how agents complete tasks, rather than how people move between different applications. As Nie noted, users no longer need to load different applications; they just need to tell the AI what they want via a chat window, and it will do the work.

The startup's central thesis is that enterprise software will increasingly be structured around intent and execution, rather than menus, files, and separate applications. The company plans to make FengKan AIOS open source by the end of October. PeakVision AI monetizes through hardware, subscriptions, and custom enterprise AI implementations. The company's broader goal is to transform project-specific work into universal solutions for various industries.

FengKan AIOS supports third-party hardware, while PeakVision AI takes a selective approach to its skills ecosystem. Nie clarified that users' end skills, which may contain proprietary workflows, will remain untouched. However, more generalized skills created by partners and leading engineers can be released to the market.

Currently, the company is testing its model through the FDE academy, launched by Shanghai Sixunited Intelligent Technology with support from Advanced Micro Devices (AMD). AMD provides computing hardware, technical toolchains, and resources for projects. PeakVision AI also collaborates with chip manufacturers in early product development stages to optimize costs and performance, including a partnership with ChangXin Memory Technologies to reduce memory costs.

Unlike companies such as Wonderful, which target large, often regulated organizations and provide them with AI platforms and implementation teams, PeakVision AI targets small and medium-sized businesses. Nie emphasized that these enterprises face the same problems—costs, technical complexity, and data security—but have fewer resources to solve them. PeakVision AI uses inexpensive hardware from the Chinese supply chain so that each implementation becomes a repeatable solution for similar clients.

Nie stated:

Expert notes that artificial intelligence is transforming finance while exacerbating risk management challenges
Read more
cgtn.com

Expert notes that artificial intelligence is transforming finance while exacerbating risk management challenges

Artificial intelligence (AI) and its integration into the financial sector became a central theme at the Financial Streets Forum 2026. During an interview at this forum, Zhang Ke, Executive Chairman of the Beijing Institute for Frontier Technology Regulation, shared his views with CGTN on the opportunities, risks, and global governance of AI in the financial sector.

Characterizing AI as the driving force of the fifth industrial revolution, Zhang emphasized that the primary value of AI lies in enhancing efficiency. Nevertheless, he warned that fundamental difficulties persist as long as AI models heavily rely on data dependency and adherence to predefined paths.

Addressing the risks of using AI in large-data financial systems, Zhang highlighted two main issues: data privacy and accountability. While data flow is a necessary condition, questions concerning data security, access levels, and public disclosure require the establishment of strict global regulatory frameworks.

Furthermore, despite AI's capability to significantly optimize decision support and research, Zhang cautioned against fully delegating final trading decisions to algorithms. In the event of financial losses, ultimate responsibility must rest with the human decision-makers, not the machine intelligence.

To mitigate these systemic risks, Zhang called for active international cooperation. He compared the need for global AI governance to major international agreements such as the Paris Agreement on climate change and the Stockholm Convention on Intellectual Property. Instead of excessive regulation, governments should collaborate on creating an international 'AI Accord' to standardize disparate rules.

Looking ahead, Zhang noted that AI provides the greatest benefit when used as a strategic consultant for high-level decision-making and group strategy, rather than replacing routine transactional operations. He concluded that human oversight remains indispensable in every critical financial maneuver.

Popular