Nedbank asserts that agricultural transformation must contribute to the creation of sustainable farms
Read more
Food For Mzansi
foodformzansi.co.za

Nedbank asserts that agricultural transformation must contribute to the creation of sustainable farms

Cobus de Bruyn from Nedbank argues that significant agricultural transformation must go beyond mere land redistribution and focus on creating productive, profitable, and commercially viable farming enterprises. He details the obstacles faced by Black farmers, the necessity of blended finance, and the importance of strengthening partnerships across the agricultural value chain to achieve long-term change.

According to Cobus de Bruyn, Head of Value Proposition for Agriculture Clients at Nedbank, a more inclusive economy in South Africa is necessary to create opportunities for new entrants, develop smallholder farmers into sustainable commercial enterprises, and support the growth of large agribusinesses owned by Black owners. He believes that true transformation should be measured by the success of the farms, not just by land ownership metrics.

Speaking on the Food for Mzansi’s Farmer’s Inside Track podcast, De Bruyn highlighted the progress made since 1994, the ongoing barriers for farmers, and the critical importance of collaboration within the agricultural value chain.

He stated that South Africa needs a more inclusive agricultural economy that can attract new participants and transform small farmers into commercially sustainable businesses while supporting the growth of large-scale agribusinesses owned by Black owners.

De Bruyn identified six drivers for achieving inclusive agriculture: expanding production and stimulating growth, building a broader and more resilient agricultural economy, improving access to finance, markets, and technology, job creation, enhancing resilience and climate adaptability, and boosting South Africa's international competitiveness.

In his view, transformation must build upon existing commercial agriculture while opening real opportunities for farmers across the sector. He emphasized that inclusive agriculture should be measured not only by land transfer or the number of Black farmers, but by how many farmers manage to become productive, profitable, creditworthy, and commercially sustainable.

De Bruyn acknowledged that progress has been made in land transfer in South Africa since 1994. He referenced a 2024 study by Vandile Sikhlobo and Professor Johan Kirsten. According to this study, approximately 19.3 million hectares have been transferred through various mechanisms, accounting for 25% of the country's available agricultural land. These mechanisms included restitution, government land redistribution, private deals, Proactive Land Acquisition Strategy, and government acquisition for agricultural use.

Nevertheless, he countered that land ownership alone does not guarantee long-term economic transformation. Secure title deeds are particularly important as land has the potential to generate wealth across generations, supporting business development and creating additional income.

Addressing this issue, De Bruyn mentioned the argument by Minister of Agriculture Willie Aukamp that transformation cannot be achieved by lifting one part of the sector at the expense of another. He noted that the solution lies in simultaneously uplifting both parts, with the one requiring more attention and resources being accelerated.

He also welcomed President Cyril Ramaphosa's announcement of 2.5 million hectares being transferred to farmers, stressing that careful planning will be required to ensure these lands reach people who can utilize them productively. Nedbank is ready to contribute its expertise to this process, aiming to ensure that transferred land genuinely goes to farmers capable of running operations and that these farmers turn their farms into productive enterprises.

One of the hurdles to transformation, according to De Bruyn, is the terminology used to describe farmers who are still developing their businesses. He opposes the term 'emerging farmer,' believing it risks defining people by what they have not yet achieved rather than recognizing them as farmers. Instead, De Bruyn prefers to refer to them as small, medium, and large commercial farmers. For him, a farmer who produces surpluses and sells them commercially qualifies as a commercial farmer.

He listed several challenges facing farmers, including access to suitable land and secure tenure, delays in title deed transfer, affordable financing, water infrastructure, technical skills, extension services, machinery, production technologies, and market access. However, access to finance remains a particularly acute problem.

De Bruyn reported that commercial banks participated in developing a conceptual document on blended finance with the Department of Agriculture but were largely excluded from this scheme. This limits their ability to finance Black farmers at various stages of commercial development. He explained that a new farmer often lacks the financial backing available to established businesses. Without grants or subsidized loans in addition to commercial financing, growth can slow down. He insisted on the need for access to blended finance to support the government's efforts in implementing transformation.

For De Bruyn, meaningful transformation requires coordinated efforts between the government, organized agriculture, commercial farmers, financiers, and other value chain participants. He stressed that partnerships are crucial for building a sustainable and inclusive agriculture, demanding coordinated action.

He believes that collaboration between commercial banks and the government could yield substantial benefits, especially if they are included in blended finance schemes. Such cooperation could help create new farming enterprises and allow existing African businesses to expand. Partnerships across the value chain can also help farmers overcome barriers in markets, production, and commercial growth.

Nedbank implements this approach through a differentiated inclusive agriculture strategy, investing in resources and processes to support transformation. De Bruyn noted the bank's collaboration with PALS (Partners in Agricultural Land Solutions), under which farmers receive support in training and mentorship, company structuring, legal agreements, and equity arrangements. This partnership also helps farmers gain market access, apply for water rights, and direct loan applications to financiers.

He observed that this collaboration has already yielded significant benefits through transformation projects, allowing the bank to see results on the ground rather than just discussing transformation in theory. Nevertheless, he believes the impact could be greater if commercial banks were included in the blended finance scheme.

Looking ten years ahead, De Bruyn hopes that South African agriculture will reach a point where transformation ceases to dominate the conversation because its results will be evident in thriving farms. His vision is an agricultural sector with active small, medium, and large Black farming operations that can access finance, reach markets, and overcome current growth constraints. For him, the goal is not merely land transfer or increased participation on paper, but building enterprises capable of producing, generating income, creating opportunities, and growing sustainably. He concluded that the path forward depends on the collaborative work of stakeholders to develop agriculture.

Similar stories

NWU Rector Dr. Anna Mokgokong advocates for rural transformation through agriculture
Read more
iol.co.za

NWU Rector Dr. Anna Mokgokong advocates for rural transformation through agriculture

Dr. Anna Mokgokong, Rector of the North-West University (NWU) and a practice professor at the NWU School of Business, called for the use of science, entrepreneurship, and partnership to transform the potential of rural areas into shared prosperity.

At an agricultural event held near Brits on October 26, 2026, Dr. Anna presented a compelling vision of how the rural economy can be changed through agriculture, innovation, and strategic alliances. Traditional leaders, government representatives, researchers, farmers, and industry partners listened attentively as she stated that rural communities should no longer be viewed merely as recipients of development aid. Their land, knowledge, resources, and entrepreneurial potential must become the foundation of modern, commercially sustainable value chains.

The event brought together a wide range of participants: traditional leaders, the North-West provincial government and its Department of Agriculture, NWU, commercial farmers, researchers, and industrial partners. Dr. Anna's central message was that no single organization can achieve rural transformation alone. Progress is made by linking community assets with science, capital, infrastructure markets, and accountable institutions, and then ensuring meaningful participation of local residents in the created value.

Agriculture as a driver of prosperity

Dr. Anna interpreted agriculture much more broadly than just food production. In her view, it is a platform for industrialization, a source of employment, an incubator for entrepreneurship, and a generator of wealth. Smallholder farmers and new commercial producers must move beyond supplying raw materials to becoming competitive producers, suppliers, and shareholders throughout the value chain. To do this, they need access to improved seeds, irrigation, machinery, finance, storage, technical support, and reliable markets.

She also highlighted the importance of structured mentorship from commercial producers. Season-long partnerships allow for the transfer of practical skills such as production planning, soil management, machinery operation, bookkeeping, and buyer requirements. However, the goal was not dependency creation, but the formation of independent farming enterprises capable of meeting commercial standards. Concurrently, reliable off-take agreements with buyers such as maltsters, brewers, mills, food processors, and others reduced uncertainty, as specifications, volumes, pricing mechanisms, delivery schedules, and contractual obligations were agreed upon even before planting.

The strategic role of NWU

For NWU, this event was strategically important as it positioned the university as a bridge between knowledge and its practical application. The university must translate research into increased yields, climate resilience, water use efficiency, pest control, plant nutrition, storage, and post-harvest loss reduction. Dr. Anna specified that scientific findings must move from laboratories to demonstration farms, from field trials to commercial production, and then to viable markets.

This agenda linked the university's academic mission with the development priorities of the North-West. By uniting researchers, students, and producers, NWU can find locally relevant solutions for growing maize, wheat, barley, etc., strengthen skills in agricultural science, farm management technology, and entrepreneurship, and present students and youth with a modern view of agriculture as a technology-driven industry (science, mechanization, logistics, processing, and business leadership).

The university can also act as a trusted coordinator. Its research potential and institutional reach can connect traditional councils and rural communities with government, financiers, recognized farmers, and industry. These partnerships must respect land rights, customary processes, and community interests, while clearly defining participation, accountability, and benefit sharing. Scientific validity requires social legitimacy if agricultural projects are to survive.

From production to industrial growth

Another topic was retaining the majority of profits in rural areas. Dr. Anna urged partners to look beyond the farm gate: to participate in milling, malting, animal feed production, food processing, packaging, warehousing, and logistics, thereby moving closer to industrial zones. Processing plants could create jobs, stimulate local suppliers, and link rural enterprises to national, regional, and international markets where commercially feasible. She cautioned that the drive for export must be balanced with the needs of domestic food security and industrial demand.

The event was not merely a ceremonial occasion—it laid a practical foundation for collaboration on suitable land, farmer participation, shared warehousing, irrigation, production financing, mentorship, research, and market access. Its strategic value lay in focusing various institutions on measurable outcomes (communities, planted, supported farmers, jobs created, local production volumes, processing capacity, etc.) rather than abstract concepts (goals).

A platform for long-term impact

For NWU, this opportunity represents a chance to make engaged scholarship visible and significant. If successful, it will demonstrate how a university can combine teaching, innovative research, and community partnership to address one of South Africa's most critical development challenges. This will strengthen NWU as a regional institution whose knowledge directly contributes to food security, inclusive growth, and rural industrialization.

Dr. Anna's message was imbued with disciplined optimism. Rural transformation will require patient investment, transparent governance, and commercially sound projects, but the core assets are land, people, knowledge, institutions, and market demand. If these assets can be connected, NWU and its partners can help turn agricultural potential into productive capacity, productive capacity into industrial growth, and industrial growth into shared prosperity.

South Africa Needs Complete Economic Transformation, Not Just Promises
Read more
iol.co.za

South Africa Needs Complete Economic Transformation, Not Just Promises

Despite years of declarations from South Africa regarding economic transformation, many Black entrepreneurs continue to face difficulties in launching their businesses. Some possess good ideas and skills to create successful companies, but without funding, these concepts often remain only on paper.

This raises an important question: how can we expect Black-owned enterprises to compete with established companies if they do not have equal access to money, markets, and business opportunities? Transformation must mean more than just changing ownership statistics; it must provide people with a real chance to participate in the economy and create what can support their families and generate jobs.

The Banking Sector Must Contribute

For many small business owners, approaching a bank for financial assistance can be demotivating. Obtaining a loan is often difficult due to a lack of sufficient collateral, a long credit history, or existing assets. Banks are responsible for safeguarding funds, but the system must also provide opportunities for potentially promising enterprises. Not every entrepreneur starts with property, savings, or family financial support.

Business valuation should be based on more than what the owner already possesses. Important aspects also include cash flow, market demand, and the ability to repay financing. South Africa needs a serious discussion on how banks can make business financing more accessible, especially for entrepreneurs in townships and rural areas. Without better access to finance, many businesses will remain small, regardless of how hard their owners work.

There is a question about the need to create a stronger fund for Black-owned enterprises. A specialized fund for companies owned by Black people could help solve some of these problems. Such a fund should support businesses at all stages—from startup to expansion—providing funding that meets their real needs. A young entrepreneur might need funds to purchase equipment, while an existing company might require working capital to fulfill a large contract. These types of businesses need different support, and financing programs must account for this difference.

The government must collaborate with development institutions and private partners to ensure affordable financing. Support should also include mentorship, financial management, and market entry assistance. However, the management of this fund must be impeccable. Entrepreneurs should not depend on political connections to receive aid. The process must be governed by clear requirements, independent oversight, and transparent reporting. The goal should be to create companies capable of surviving, hiring people, and competing without constant reliance on state support.

Ownership Alone Is Not Enough

A company may be owned by a Black owner but still struggle to grow. Winning a contract is insignificant if the business cannot afford materials, pay workers, or wait months for invoice payment. Therefore, large companies and government agencies must look beyond simply awarding contracts. They must facilitate conditions under which small suppliers can become reliable long-term partners.

There is also a need to open up more opportunities in sectors such as manufacturing, agriculture, technology, and energy. Black entrepreneurs should not be limited to a narrow range of industries when they have the potential to participate in the entire economy. This is where transformation must become evident: through built factories, expanded farms, developed technologies, and created jobs.

Time for Practical Action Has Come

The government cannot achieve economic transformation on its own. Banks must revise their approach to serving new enterprises, while established companies must be ready to make room for new suppliers and competitors. Entrepreneurs also bear responsibility for professionally running their businesses and using funds wisely. However, expecting success from them without access to the resources necessary to compete is unrealistic.

South Africa does not lack ambitious people. What entrepreneurs often lack is financial support and market access to turn those ambitions into sustainable businesses. Full economic transformation should be measured by the changes happening in people's lives, not just by what is written in political documents. If Black-owned businesses are to become a stronger part of the economy, access to finance and significant commercial opportunities must be treated as priorities. The question is no longer whether transformation is needed. It is whether we are ready to take the practical steps required to implement it.

Farmers call for urgent support for sustainable local food supply chains
Read more
foodformzansi.co.za

Farmers call for urgent support for sustainable local food supply chains

In connection with Food Day, a call has been made to establish sustainable local food supply systems, the main goal of which is to eradicate food insecurity. Ensuring reliable food production is another important aspect that requires joint efforts from various stakeholders to protect and improve the agricultural sector.

Nomphumelelo Dlamvini, a farmer from the Gauteng province, emphasized that achieving sustainable food security requires providing farmers at the household level with the necessary equipment and support to produce food for the entire country.

She explained that issues such as high fuel costs and rising production expenses hinder the effective operation of farmers. Furthermore, inadequate infrastructure can lead to product spoilage for those who supply fresh goods to retailers and markets.

Dlamvini also noted a discrepancy between existing support programs and policies developed for farmers and what they observe on the ground. According to her, farmers are too often expected to contribute to food security and economic development without access to resources and continuous institutional support to achieve these goals.

In her opinion, an approach based on farmer participation is crucial in developing and implementing policies so that they can understand the real conditions of their operations. She stated that the transition to sustainable agriculture requires practical, accessible, and long-term support, not just political statements and promises.

Necessary conditions include access to power infrastructure, proper maintenance of roads, and communication infrastructure. Dlamvini stressed that it is impossible to run a business and produce food if a farmer cannot connect to markets due to lack of connectivity.

Reggie Nkambule, a maize farmer from the Free State, agreed that the transition to more ecological and economically efficient agriculture is only possible through infrastructure improvement. He noted that farmers are ready to work the land, but the environment is not conducive to it.

Ashraf Sirkot, project manager for urban greening and landscape management at Greenpop, pointed out that the global food system today depends on a very narrow range of crops. He warned that the disappearance of traditional local varieties, indigenous livestock breeds, and wild food species reduces the genetic base upon which traditional agriculture relies.

Sirkot stated that access to land is the most fundamental factor determining the viability of traditional agriculture. Without guaranteed ownership rights—whether formal titles, customary rights, or long-term leases—farmers have no incentive to invest in long-term farming and food production.

He called for recognizing the role of farming not only as a production system but also as a cultural heritage, an ecosystem management system, and the foundation of food sovereignty. He also recommended encouraging youth involvement in agriculture by providing access to technology, credit, and increasing the attractiveness and profitability of farming.

Essentially, Sirkot added that without land, farming becomes culturally and practically impossible, turning independent food producers into hired laborers.

Meanwhile, Professor Jaco Wolschenk, Associate Professor of Strategy and Sustainable Development at Stellenbosch Business School, noted that solving the paradox of hunger and food waste must receive the same comprehensive, high-level approach as the country's crises related to electricity, infrastructure, and crime.

He emphasized that the issues affecting global production and trade are interconnected with climate, energy, emissions, water resources, and food production, and all must be considered when developing solutions for ensuring food security and minimizing food waste.

Wolschenk stated that the question is no longer just about the ability to produce enough food, but also about how and where agricultural production takes place, and which specific crops are grown to support nutrition and a sustainable food system that will serve all residents of South Africa in the future.

Wolschenk highlighted several practical ways in which farmers, organizations, and households can reduce food waste at key stages of the supply chain. He advised farm-level producers to ensure that production meets market demand and quality specifications, and to seek sales channels for lower-quality products.

Products that do not meet standards, such as smaller or misshapen fruits and vegetables or those damaged by wind, can create opportunities for small agro-processing enterprises, such as soup and juice producers.

Popular