Social Media Platforms Restore User Control Over Feeds Through New Algorithmic Features
Read more
Egypt Independent
www.egyptindependent.com

Social Media Platforms Restore User Control Over Feeds Through New Algorithmic Features

Social media platforms have begun implementing features that allow users to manage more precisely what content they see in their feeds, which is a reaction to the platforms' long-standing reliance on automated recommendations.

Specifically, Instagram has expanded the ability for users to provide specific feedback to tailor their feed. This trend is visible across the entire social media ecosystem, where platforms offer similar tools to increase control over displayed content.

Users have long demanded such features after social networks started relying on their algorithmic recommendations to populate feeds. In addition to Instagram and Facebook from Meta, services like YouTube, TikTok, and newer platforms such as Divine have introduced capabilities to customize the 'For You' homepage or create personalized feeds based on specific topics.

Tessa Lyons, Vice President of Product at Instagram, noted that the main goal was to 'restore the sense of autonomy you had when you controlled the accounts you followed, but in a world that still gives you the benefits of recommendations,' such as easier discovery of new content.

Thanks to advancements in AI language understanding, platforms can now process specific user feedback about what they like or dislike, instead of just making assumptions based on views and interactions. Lyons emphasized that it is now possible to use human language to indicate whether a user wants to see more or less of a certain topic, since previously systems could not accurately understand what content on a topic, such as 'tennis,' would be most relevant.

This shift represents a sharp departure from the approach that dominated recent years, when chronological, subscription-based feeds were replaced by algorithmic recommendations. It was previously assumed that companies, due to the vast amount of data they collected, could predict user preferences better than the users themselves.

Although this transition might have benefited businesses, users often complained about a loss of control, pointing out that recommendation algorithms could lead them into endless cycles of irrelevant or even toxic content. Platforms faced particular scrutiny due to potentially harmful content recommendations for young people.

This user dissatisfaction has intensified over the past year as AI plays an increasing role in filtering internet content, coinciding with broader populist pushback against AI, according to Tim Wenninger, a professor of computer science and engineering at Notre Dame University who studies AI and social media.

Wenninger stated that people are tired of AI 'feeding them nonsense' and miss the old days, wishing to simply follow who they subscribe to and see the latest updates.

In 2022, Instagram brought back the chronological feed option, introducing 'following' and 'favorites' feeds that showed content only from selected accounts, although the app defaulted to the main recommended feed. Then, last June, TikTok introduced a 'topic management' feature that allows users to regulate the amount of content from specific categories, such as fashion or health, using a slider. This tool does not remove topics entirely but gives the TikTok algorithm a more direct signal of user desires.

TikTok also added 'smart keyword filtering,' which excludes videos containing a user-marked keyword, as well as related terms, from the feed. Several months later, Instagram continued this trend by releasing the 'your algorithm' feature, which shows users topics that the app thinks they are interested in and allows them to add or avoid certain topics. This feature, initially available only in the Reels section, is now available across the entire Instagram app and was recently expanded to Facebook.

As Lyons explained, this feature helps with rapid changes in user interests—for example, a person might stop being interested in wedding planning after marriage or videos of an ex-partner's favorite band after a breakup. The current 'your algorithm' settings include topics such as 'family rituals' and 'Celine Dion.' In the coming months, Instagram plans to encourage users to use this feature more actively, which is currently accessible via a button in the upper right corner of the Reels tab.

Last month, YouTube announced its own 'custom feeds' feature at its annual 'Creator on YouTube' event, which allows users to create separate tabs next to the main feed, customized for specific needs or interests, such as workout videos or 'late-night ASMR.' However, these features do not guarantee that users can prevent AI-generated content from appearing in their feeds. Nil Mohan, CEO of YouTube, told reporters at the September event that separating AI-generated content from human-created content is an 'artificial distinction,' as many videos combine both types.

He clarified that the YouTube custom feed feature is primarily intended to allow viewers to 'program their feeds' around specific topics and 'amplify or dampen what they want to see, and change it throughout the day.' Wenninger noted that it remains unclear how exactly these changes will affect users. He added that while users can inform the platform of their desire to see content on favorite topics, people are more likely to view, comment on, or share content that upsets or disappoints them, which can confuse algorithms. Wenninger concluded: 'If you say you like football, but then never watch football videos, what should the AI do? People interact with what upsets and saddens them; it is part of our nature. I hope this will change that attitude a little.'

Similar stories

Services promising to close Instagram, Facebook, and YouTube accounts for a small fee become active on social networks
Read more
www.aajtak.in

Services promising to close Instagram, Facebook, and YouTube accounts for a small fee become active on social networks

Services have appeared on social media offering to close a content creator's account for money through the collective submission of complaints. These individuals, referred to as digital 'supari killers,' offer to attack accounts on Instagram, Facebook, and YouTube via mass reporting.

An investigation by India Today OSINT revealed five such websites. The cost of their services ranges from a few tens to thousands of rupees. This raises the question of how much the abuse of the reporting system can affect the recognition and income of digital creators.

Mass reporting implies sending a large number of violation reports against a social media account so that the platform conducts a review and takes action if a rule is broken. Although the reporting system is intended to inform about unacceptable content and rule-breaking accounts, its coordinated use can be aimed at harassing a specific person. Nevertheless, receiving a complaint itself does not guarantee account closure.

The five websites discovered by India Today OSINT claim to provide mass reporting services for Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, and other platforms. One site claims it can delete a Facebook profile for approximately 17,000 rupees, a business page for 23,000 rupees, and a group for 28,000 rupees.

Another site offers a service to close YouTube accounts. It states that the cost and timeline will be determined after checking the target account. It is important to note that these are only the claims of these websites, and independent confirmation of whether they can actually close accounts is absent.

The website Naizop sells 'Report Bots' for Instagram; one of their services costs 36 rupees. The site claims that its premium package uses reports from old and seemingly active accounts. They also advise clients to report sudden increases in subscribers or likes on the target account to raise suspicion in Instagram's automated systems. However, the site does not guarantee account deletion.

On the second site, SMM Pirat, there are 20 reporting plans for Instagram, starting from a price of 46 rupees. This resource also claims to provide similar services for other social networks. Some sellers claim that their services help combat fake accounts and trolls, and they promise client confidentiality. Naizop indicates that it cannot provide proof of service completion to maintain the confidentiality of its methods. Many services communicate via Telegram or WhatsApp, while some accept payment only in cryptocurrency.

The issue of alleged abuse of digital reporting became a topic of discussion following the death of 27-year-old financial influencer Vi. Harish from Chennai. Harish, known as 'Finance With Harish,' had over a million subscribers. According to media reports, in the weeks before his suicide, he lost access to his accounts, and his channel was repeatedly subjected to mass reporting.

The police have filed a case on charges of inciting suicide. However, it has not yet been established whether mass reporting had any relation to his death, so a direct conclusion about the link between the two events cannot be drawn.

According to a press release from the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting published last year, the direct revenue of the Indian content creator economy amounts to between 20 and 25 billion dollars. Forecasts suggest this amount could rise to 100–125 billion dollars by 2030. According to the American company Boston Consulting Group (BCG), Indian creators influence consumer spending worth more than 350 billion dollars annually, and this figure is projected to exceed one trillion dollars by 2030. Furthermore, Google reported that in 2025, the YouTube creative ecosystem contributed more than 18,000 crore rupees to India's GDP and supported over 960 thousand permanent jobs.

For content creators, social networks are the primary source of income, allowing them to reach audiences, earn advertising revenue, and enter into partnerships with brands. Suspension or restriction of account access can negatively affect their income. This can also affect people associated with content creators in video production and other work.

Meta has named coordinated abuse of the reporting function a security threat. In the company's view, such actions can be used to suppress people's voices. Nevertheless, the platform's review process between receiving a complaint about an account and its suspension is crucial. Therefore, mass reporting cannot be considered the reason for action against an account without confirming the cause of such measures.

Popular