Srinath Ravichandran and Suyash Singh discuss overcoming setbacks in space technology
Read more
YourStory [india, en]
yourstory.com

Srinath Ravichandran and Suyash Singh discuss overcoming setbacks in space technology

The development of private space technologies in India is often highlighted in the press through success stories; however, behind every successful rocket launch or satellite deployment lies a complex reality characterized by hundreds of investor rejections, serious supply chain issues, and the constant threat of orbital failure.

During the 17th TechSparks event by YourStory, Shradha Sharma, founder and CEO of Srinath Ravichandran, AgniKul Cosmos, co-founder and CEO of Suyash Singh, and GalaxEye shared their practical experience in building aerospace ventures in an emerging market.

When AgniKul began operations in 2017, the Indian regulatory framework for private space technologies was still taking shape, and local venture capital for deep tech was virtually non-existent. Ravichandran faced 275 investor rejections before securing initial funding. Singh encountered similar difficulties at GalaxEye, receiving around 100 rejections.

To survive in the early stages, they had to break down ambitious goals into smaller, manageable steps instead of relying on rigid long-term plans. Ravichandran noted: 'The first thing you have to do is start, no matter what... break it down into smaller stages and start doing something... patience was the most important thing for me.'

This pragmatic approach also changed the business models of both founders. In Western countries, traditional aerospace programs often require half a billion dollars in capital before generating revenue. In contrast, AgniKul focused on a per-kilogram transport model for small satellites, effectively acting as an orbital cargo carrier, aiming for commercial viability at the $50 to $60 million level.

Explaining this lean approach, Ravichandran emphasized: 'It's more like you give me 500 million dollars, and then I start paying you back. That's not how India works. That's not how I was built.'

Following a successful test launch in May 2024 using 3D-printed engines and a mobile launchpad, AgniKul is preparing for customer flights in orbit while testing rocket stage reusability for safe equipment return to Earth to reduce launch costs.

While launch providers handle transportation, satellite manufacturers face different operational challenges. GalaxEye developed OptoSAR—a patented, world-first technology that combines optical cameras with synthetic aperture radar for observing Earth through clouds and darkness.

However, space hardware is extremely demanding. Just 30 days after the launch of India's largest recognized private liquid satellite, GalaxEye lost contact with the spacecraft.

Commenting on this failure, Singh stressed: 'Whatever path we take, dealing with such failures will be very, very important for the space industry.'

Despite these risks, market demand is growing rapidly. The rise in geopolitical conflicts worldwide has made Earth observation from space indispensable.

Singh explained: 'Geopolitics is heating up, and space observation is not an option. It is a necessity. Therefore, I think defense is one of the biggest markets.'

Nevertheless, scaling up space ventures in India reveals persistent structural friction. Growth capital and seed funding of $100 million or more remain scarce as institutional investors slowly adapt to the return profiles of deep tech, where significant initial R&D precedes long-term profit.

Supply chains also create difficulties. Startups often face high minimum order quantities, meaning the smallest number of individual components a manufacturer agrees to supply, forcing founders to rely on European suppliers for specialized light sensors when domestic alternatives are too heavy.

Despite these hurdles, both founders remain optimistic about human capital. Strict foreign visa regulations in Western aerospace sectors encourage leading Indian engineers to stay or return home. Combined with employee stock option schemes that offer real wealth creation, deep tech in India is gaining prestige, contributing to the maturity of the country's private space technology ecosystem.

Similar stories

SpaceX CEO Elon Musk states that Starlink services should be available in India, and competition benefits consumers
Read more
business-standard.com

SpaceX CEO Elon Musk states that Starlink services should be available in India, and competition benefits consumers

Elon Musk, founder of SpaceX, stated that Starlink services should be accessible to more people in India, and that the emergence of competition will benefit customers. He noted that even if Reliance Jio earns less money, the company will not go bankrupt.

These statements came shortly before the expected Initial Public Offering (IPO) of Jio, which could be the largest in India and value the company at over $100 billion. Musk once again spoke out against the Reliance group, calling it a 'de facto monopolist in India.'

In his post on his social media platform X, in response to user messages that he claimed supported Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL), Musk criticized the arguments put forth by the 'army of internet propagandists of Ambani.' He called them 'absurd hypocrisy and hyperbole,' pointing out the contradiction: first they claim Starlink cannot compete with the monopolist's low prices, and then they state that Starlink will be too strong a competitor.

Musk emphasized that competition always benefits the average citizen of India by providing them with more options. He added that if Starlink turns out to be too expensive in India, no one will use it, so SpaceX must make the prices affordable.

His comments followed a series of messages questioning delays in the approval of Starlink services in India and suggesting that some large business conglomerates, particularly the Reliance group, are hindering Starlink's entry into the Indian market.

Earlier, on Saturday, Musk addressed Prime Minister Ambani, apologizing for not realizing that he was the 'real boss of India.' He asked whether Ambani was willing to allow Starlink to compete despite the preference for maintaining 'monopolistic exploitation of the great people of India.'

He also pointed out that Starlink could be useful to users, including small businesses and children's education, in areas of India lacking internet access, and could save lives during natural disasters when other communication systems fail.

However, Musk's accusations drew sharp criticism. Nishikant Dubey, Chairman of the Parliamentary Committee on Communications and Information Technology, responded that the government is aware of the problems faced by the country's security services through Starlink since 2013–2014, and that the Ministry of Defence, the Ministry of Home Affairs, and investigative agencies suffer from these threats' dangerous games. He called for providing internet access to the poor in their own country, America, at affordable rates first, before making accusations, noting that India is a healthy democratic sovereign nation that does not change its security policy under pressure or on social media.

Rajiv Kumar, former Vice Chairman of NITI Aayog, stated that India should challenge Musk's monopoly in space communications by using the $145 billion USO fund. He proposed using these funds to assist Indian telecom operators such as Airtel and Reliance Jio so they can urgently deploy their satellite networks to compete with Elon Musk's Starlink. He believes this would be a better use of funds than endlessly waiting for BSNL to develop the necessary capacity for universal coverage.

Eutelsat OneWeb (now Eutelsat Group), supported by the Bharti group, and Jio Satellite Communications, a subsidiary of Reliance Jio, have received licenses, but they are still awaiting security clearances. Starlink received its latest approval in 2025, while Eutelsat and Jio received theirs earlier.

Jio is independently building its constellation of Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites, which will compete with global players like Starlink and Amazon Leo.

The government refuted Musk's claims last week, stating that all satellite broadband providers must comply with safety regulations to operate in India. The Ministry of Communications stated that the country's authorization system for telecommunication and satellite services is 'fair and non-discriminatory,' and any suggestion of its selective application is 'unfounded and erroneous.'

Telecom Minister Jyotiraditya Singh 'clarified the situation' on Friday, stating that India does not permit monopolies in any sector, including satellite communications, and that licenses were issued to all three companies—Reliance Jio, OneWeb, and Starlink—that applied. He also mentioned that the fourth interested party, Amazon Leo, must undergo the same process. Security clearance is conducted by the Ministry of Home Affairs, which will also issue final approvals. Singh added that the government is in discussions with the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India regarding satellite spectrum pricing, and only after all entities meet or comply with the security conditions can they begin operations.

Popular