Millions of students preparing for NEET take exams hoping to gain admission to medical colleges based on their efforts. However, reports of leaks or irregularities in examination materials cast doubt on both the students' efforts and the fairness of the testing system itself. Following disputes related to NEET-UG in recent years, the need for significant transformations in the examination system has been proposed.
The Standing Parliamentary Committee on Education, Women, Children, Youth, and Sports, chaired by Rajya Sabha member Mukul Vasani, recommended conducting NEET-UG in Computer Based Testing (CBT) format instead of the traditional paper-based format. The committee also suggested establishing at least 1000 secure government examination centers across the country, ensuring at least one such center in every district. Its 382nd report was presented on October 9, 2026.
It is worth noting that disputes surrounding NEET-UG were actively discussed in 2024 when allegations of exam material leaks and irregularities surfaced. Questions arose regarding exam results, grace marks, and unusually high scores obtained in some centers. This issue reached the Supreme Court, and the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) conducted an investigation into the alleged violations. Subsequently, an expert committee was formed to improve the examination system, with an emphasis on enhancing testing security.
However, the problems did not cease. In May 2026, the incident of NEET-UG material leakage resurfaced. Based on a complaint from the Ministry of Education, the CBI registered a case on May 12, 2026, regarding the alleged leak of materials and irregularities. According to preliminary information gathered during the investigation, rumors about newspaper leaks before the exam heightened tensions. The investigation confirmed that the material leak had indeed occurred. After the cancellation of NEET-UG 2026, the parliamentary committee acknowledged that procedural and institutional improvements are necessary to ensure exam security, despite the use of biometric verification, mobile jammers, and AI-based video surveillance.
In light of this, the parliamentary committee put forward a strong recommendation in favor of transitioning to the CBT mode. The committee believes that computer-based testing can reduce the need for printing and distributing question papers to centers. This, in turn, may help decrease the probability of material leaks. Nevertheless, the committee emphasized that before initiating online exams, it is essential to ensure the availability of sufficient government centers and technical infrastructure. Special attention was given to expanding CBT capabilities for students from rural areas and small towns.
The committee also proposed providing students with the opportunity to familiarize themselves with the online exam format through digital mock tests. For regions where there is currently insufficient computer access or internet connectivity, a temporary solution was suggested: sending encrypted questions directly to the center for printing.
The committee did not only determine the exam format but also opined on the number of shifts in which it should be conducted. It was suggested to consider conducting NEET-UG in two phases. This could involve holding a general preliminary exam, followed by a specialized main exam for different courses. The goal of this proposal is to achieve a more detailed understanding of the needs of candidates applying for MBBS, as well as those applying for courses such as AYUSH, dentistry, and nursing. The committee also believes this will help reduce unnecessary competition and pressure on students. Furthermore, it was recommended to review cut-off criteria and percentiles for better alignment between the number of qualified candidates and available seats.
The committee proposed that the National Testing Agency (NTA) develop an extensive and continuously updated digital question bank across various subjects. To achieve this, it is recommended to involve experts from leading institutions such as IIT, AIIMS, and IIM. Emphasis was also placed on preparing examination materials closer to the exam date and verifying the background of experts for potential conflicts of interest. The committee recommended creating a public national list of companies providing examination-related services that have been blacklisted by any state or examination agency to prevent these companies from securing contracts again.
The report also raised the issue of staff shortages at the National Testing Agency. According to the committee, out of 39 sanctioned positions at NTA locations, only employees in 23 positions were working, meaning approximately 41 percent of positions remained vacant. The committee recommended hiring permanent staff with experience in fields such as psychometrics, cybersecurity, digital technologies, data analysis, and examination management. Furthermore, NTA should prioritize its focus on higher education entrance examinations.