In an editorial article, the publication Kayhan highlighted the topic of resuming channels to bypass financial restrictions through the Russian banking system. The Central Bank of Iran has already transferred more than $1.5 billion through the Russian banking network, using this route to circumvent American financial sanctions.
According to available information, in addition to China, the infrastructure of Russian banks can be used to conduct trade with countries such as India, Brazil, and African states. Nevertheless, despite the impact of sanctions and external pressure, the growth of exchange rates cannot be explained solely by external factors. Therefore, one of the government's most important tasks under current conditions is managing external pressure while simultaneously abandoning and revising economic corrective policies.
Diplomacy backed by strength and readiness for defense
In its analysis of Araghchi's meeting with foreign ambassadors, heads of diplomatic missions, and representatives of international organizations in Tehran, the publication Shargh asserted that the Iranian Foreign Minister sought to present a clear picture of Tehran's evolving foreign policy. The main message was that the door for diplomacy remains open, but it is now supported by a higher readiness for defense. The essence of Araghchi's statements is not only negotiation or only resistance, but the simultaneous pursuit of both. From this perspective, Araghchi's recent remarks can be seen as an attempt to define Iran's foreign policy at a stage where war, negotiations, the Strait of Hormuz, and regional relations have become more interconnected than ever.
In a comment, the publication Jam-e-Jam emphasized Iran's ethical view and its approach to international interaction. While Western governments accused the Islamic Republic of inciting war and claimed that Iran intended to eliminate some regional countries and resolve disputes by military means, Iran consistently stated its preference for understanding and negotiations in resolving foreign policy disputes, including the nuclear issue. The newspaper cited numerous rounds of negotiations and serious dialogue with world powers and neighboring countries as proof that Iran prefers engagement over confrontation. In particular, over the last year and several months, Iran has repeatedly shown a willingness to discuss nuclear issues, accepting proposals for dialogue. However, Iran's opponents chose the path of conflict and provoked two, possibly three wars in the country over the past 18 months. Iran's ethical and humanitarian view of power was once again contrasted with what it characterized as the aggressive and inhumane approach of its opponents.
Khorasan: Iran is fully prepared
In an article dedicated to the current policies of Iran and America, Khorasan argued that Iran's opponents have entered a phase of 'operational patience,' trying to choose the most effective and least costly option from various scenarios. However, this patience stems not from caution, but from weakness, and Trump knows that losing one or both houses of Congress will significantly complicate his position. Military restrictions continue to restrain any potential actions by the US armed forces. Although Iran's opponents may consider the situation static, the realities on the ground remain dynamic and subject to change. Under these circumstances, it was predicted that war could eventually begin. It was also emphasized that Iran maintains its commitment to serious negotiations, although not in a form implying capitulation or deception. The article concluded that Iran is preparing for the worst-case scenarios, harbors no optimism about future events, possesses a wide range of response options, and considers maintaining public calm the most important element of national security.
Ettelaat: Escalation of the crisis in the region
Ettelaat reported that the indirect connection between Tehran and Washington continues, but military and political signs indicating a growing probability of a new conflict are even more significant. According to the publication, Iran stated that it received a response from the US to its proposal for a seven-day confidence-building measure regarding the opening of the Strait of Hormuz and is currently considering it. Simultaneously, Washington is strengthening its forces in the region, and Donald Trump has spoken of a decision regarding Iran that could be made via a 'light path' or a 'heavy path.' Meanwhile, Iranian military and political officials spoke of greater readiness for any future conflict and improved missile capabilities. The newspaper noted that the main disagreement between the parties remains evident: Iran views the opening of Hormuz, the cessation of pressure on shipping, and the easing of sanctions as the main pillars of negotiations, whereas the United States continues to place the nuclear issue at the center of its proposals. According to the article, this divergence, combined with the strengthening of the US military presence in the region, has created a situation where diplomacy has not completely collapsed, but discussions about the possibility of political pressure turning into a new confrontation are becoming increasingly frequent.