The question of whether any club is too big to fail is being raised against the backdrop of the investigation into Manchester City. When the Premier League's independent commission ruled the club guilty, confirming systematic breaches of financial rules over nine seasons and the use of 'fictitious' contracts to artificially inflate revenues by more than £900 million (approximately 19.5 billion rubles), it shattered the long-held myth in English football that superclubs possess enough power to avoid serious sporting sanctions.
While the Premier League considers various penalties, ranging from significant point deductions to outright exclusion, precedents set by Juventus in 2006, Rangers in 2012, and Olympique Marseille in 1993 provide a clear roadmap of how modern giants can collapse under regulatory pressure and how long the road to recovery might be.
Fraud Schemes
Juventus was stripped of two Serie A titles (in the 2004/05 and 2005/06 seasons) and relegated to Serie B due to a nine-point penalty; however, they managed to overcome the crisis related to match-fixing and re-enter European elite status.
How Juventus Navigated Hardship
The closest parallel to Manchester City's current crisis was the 2006 Calciopoli match-fixing scandal, which led to Juventus losing two Serie A titles (2004/05 and 2005/06) and being relegated to Serie B with a nine-point deduction. At the time, the 'Old Lady' was the undisputed leader of Italian football, boasting a squad composed of World Cup winners and Ballon d'Or contenders. The immediate consequences were catastrophic: stars such as Zlatan Ibrahimović, Patrick Vieira, Fabio Cannavaro, and Liliane Thuram left Turin, wiping out tens of millions in squad value overnight.
Nevertheless, Juventus's recovery demonstrated institutional resilience. With the support of a dedicated core of players—Gianluigi Buffon, Alessandro Del Piero, Pavel Nedvěd, and David Trezeguet—who remained to fight in the second division, Juve managed to win Serie B in their first season (2006/07). Although five years of structural rebuilding were required before they won another Scudetto title in the 2011/12 season under Antonio Conte, this comeback ushered in an unprecedented era of nine consecutive Serie A titles. The financial blow was colossal—commercial revenues plummeted immediately after the scandal—but the organization survived. In Manchester City's case, 115 charges were established, and the club could face relegation or exclusion from the Premier League.
Darker Precedents
If Juventus serves as a model for recovery after relegation, Marseille and Rangers illustrate the catastrophic risks of administrative violations. In 1993, Marseille was at the peak of European football, having just won its debut UEFA Champions League. However, within months, a financial and corruption scandal led to the club being stripped of the French league championship title for the 1992/93 season and relegated to Division 2. Marseille spent two years in the second division, suffering from financial instability, and it took over a decade to recover domestically.
Regarding Rangers in 2012, systemic financial insolvency and tax irregularities led to the club's liquidation. The team was forced to start playing in the fourth tier of Scottish football (League Two). Although Rangers managed three promotions in four seasons to return to the top flight, the financial trauma severely undermined their ability to compete for nearly a decade.
Closer to Home
One does not need to look across continents to see the Premier League's growing commitment to enforcing strict regulatory compliance. Everton became the first high-profile victim of the league's Profit and Sustainability Rules (PSR), receiving a 10-point deduction—later reduced to six upon appeal—and then another two-point deduction in the same season. The 'Toffees' were penalized for exceeding allowable losses by less than £20 million (about 435 million rubles), a breach that dragged one of England's most famous top-division institutions into a grueling battle for survival throughout the entire season.
This was followed by Nottingham Forest, which received a four-point deduction after exceeding the loss threshold by £34.5 million. The commission noted that despite Forest's cooperation, the violation of financial limits directly undermined the sporting integrity of the competition. If relatively modest PSR limit breaches result in point deductions that threaten a club's Premier League status, the regulatory precedent set by Everton and Forest leaves the Premier League with little choice but to apply much harsher sanctions for Manchester City's decade-long systemic inflation.
City Vows 'Relentless' Appeal
In response to the commission's decision, Manchester City published an uncompromising official statement, rejecting the panel's findings and signaling a protracted legal battle. The statement read: 'The club is innocent of the allegations brought by the Premier League, and there exists a comprehensive array of irrefutable evidence supporting all its positions on this matter. Therefore, the club will be relentless and, if necessary, proactive in all relevant regulatory and legal forums.' It also noted: 'The Premier League process is ongoing, and significant elements have yet to be concluded. Manchester City FC will now pursue the avenues of appeal available to it on the basis that the opinion contains manifest material errors in law, principle, and fact, and is unsafe.'


