Young Indian batter Vaivava Suryavanshi is attracting attention due to his performances, but his future in the Test format is debated among cricket experts. Suryavanshi was part of the team for a T20 series against Afghanistan but did not make the starting lineup in the matches.
Nevertheless, he demonstrated his capability in the Test format by playing important matches for the team in the Duleep Trophy tournament, which strengthened his claim for a spot in the national team. Despite this, some cricket veterans believe that Suryavanshi is not suited for Test matches.
Former England spinner Monty Panesar questioned Suryavanshi's batting technique. He stated in a podcast that the batter's current technique would not allow him to achieve long-term success across all three formats: T20, ODI, and Test. Panesar believes that Suryavanshi will not succeed in Test cricket.
According to Panesar, in the current era, only a few players, such as Harry Brook, rank in the top 10 in both Test and T20. The expert emphasized that Suryavanshi currently lacks the correct technique for playing with red ball (Test).
Statistical analysis shows Suryavanshi's brilliant performance in T20, where he scored 1670 runs at an impressive strike rate of 216.32 and an average of around 43 across all T20 matches. However, his figures in First-Class, or red ball, look more modest: he scored only 399 runs in 17 matches with an average of 23.47.
On the other hand, former Australian captain Michael Clarke strongly disagrees with Panesar's assertions. Clarke is convinced that a talented player like Suryavanshi is capable of dominating all three formats. He cited Virat Kohli and AB de Villiers as examples, noting that these legends were not only dangerous batters in T20 but also great players in Test cricket.
According to Clarke, if Suryavanshi decides to play Test cricket, watching his performances will be a very exciting spectacle.



