SEBI to review brokers' concerns regarding MDR rate for UPI transactions
Read more
Business Standard
business-standard.com

SEBI to review brokers' concerns regarding MDR rate for UPI transactions

SEBI Chairman Tuhin Kanta Pandey stated on Thursday that the regulator will examine the issues raised by securities brokers concerning the new Merchant Discount Rate (MDR) for large fund transfers via the Unified Payments Interface (UPI).

The MDR rate for capital market operations is set at 0.02 percent of the transaction amount, with a cap of 300 rupees for payments to mutual funds, securities, brokers, dealers, and investment advisors. This MDR system will become effective from October 15.

However, recurring standing instructions or mandates through UPI, such as Systematic Investment Plans (SIPs) in mutual funds, will not be subject to MDR charges.

Review of Broker Concerns

Pandey noted that there are important aspects that will be reviewed to find ways to alleviate these concerns. Several brokers have expressed worry about the MDR charges because, under SEBI's mandate, brokers are required to periodically return unused client funds, known as client float, back to clients. SEBI introduced this rule to prevent the misuse of funds by brokers.

Sources added that broker associations have sent letters to the market regulator, and discussions are currently underway regarding the rising operational costs. Uttam Bagri, Managing Director of BCB Brokerage, stated that treating brokers as sellers for MDR purposes is fundamentally flawed. He emphasized that brokers are primarily transit structures where client funds enter clearing corporations to ensure margin and settlements. Consequently, levying MDR on the entire flow of funds, rather than on the actual income of the broker, which is the brokerage commission, will make UPI excessively expensive and practically unsuitable for the brokerage industry.

Other brokers also pointed out that this levy will become a permanent operating expense, amounting to millions, without generating any trades or revenue for the broker. Nitin Kamath, founder of the discount brokerage platform Zerodha, wrote on social media that the regulation essentially forces money movement every month or quarter, and the broker may end up bearing the cost when the money is returned, without receiving any additional gain or income.

Payment processing partners for such brokers indicate that some brokers might prefer using internet banking over UPI, given that internet banking transactions have a fixed fee of 8–12 rupees agreed upon directly with banks. In comparison, an MDR of 0.02 percent for a UPI transaction of 1 lakh would result in a fee of 20 rupees for the broker. For capital market payments, the UPI limit per transaction is set at 5 lakhs, and the daily limit is set at 10 lakhs.

Other Regulatory Priorities

Speaking at the summit, the SEBI chairman also announced that the regulator will focus on expanding participation in Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) and Infrastructure Investment Trusts (InvITs), deepening the corporate bond market, and continuing the development of the Alternative Investment Fund (AIF) structure. He highlighted the potential to attract a larger volume of domestic institutional capital, long-term global investors, and retail participants into REITs and InvITs. Furthermore, the corporate bond market requires a broader base of issuers, greater participation, and better secondary market liquidity.

Regarding AIFs, SEBI proposed revising the accredited investor structure to broaden access for qualified investors, increase the pool of domestic and foreign venture capital, and strengthen the market ecosystem. Pandey also identified strengthening municipal financing as a priority task, as cities are expected to require more sophisticated financing mechanisms. He stressed that building institutional capacity, improving governance, and enhancing financial reporting will be crucial for boosting investor confidence and transforming municipal bonds into a more significant source of funding for urban infrastructure.

Similar stories

Sebi Chairman reports liquidity issues in global markets following the introduction of closed auction
Read more
business-standard.com

Sebi Chairman reports liquidity issues in global markets following the introduction of closed auction

The Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi), Tuhin Kanta Pandey, stated on Thursday that reduced liquidity was observed during the initial stages of implementing the Closed Auction Session (CAS) across various global jurisdictions. This mechanism was adopted by India starting August 3rd.

Speaking at the Global Fintech Fest (GFF), the Sebi chairman emphasized that although the regulator will soon publish a consultative document with proposals for changes within CAS, the CAS mechanism itself remains in effect. Pandey noted that many participants highly appreciated the introduction of CAS, including the MSCI rebalancing, and technically everything proceeded successfully.

However, he pointed to a market segment experiencing difficulties because the settlement price was entirely tied to a specific method. The market regulator announced last week the preparation of a consultative document regarding changes in the methodology for determining settlement prices for derivatives contracts, based on feedback received. These proposals are expected this week.

The Chairman added that CAS will continue to operate, and the only issue is liquidity. He reported that many market participants discussed the launch in different jurisdictions, including the US, Japan, and Hong Kong, and noted that initially, wherever CAS was introduced, liquidity was always a problem, but it improves over time. He questioned whether they should just wait or if there are temporary solutions for this problem.

As an example, he mentioned that Hong Kong launched a closed auction in 2008 but withdrew it in 2009 due to end-of-day price fluctuations; however, it was later reinstated in 2016 with the introduction of price limits and other modifications. Some brokerage firms anticipate stricter auction price ranges, expansion, or the imposition of a trading session, or the calculation of index derivatives based on volume-weighted average price.

Addressing the panel at GFF, Pandey elaborated on the regulator's use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools for supervision and assurance. He explained that AI can help regulators identify risks earlier, but it must complement, not replace, regulatory judgment. With AI, monitoring can shift from periodic to proactive. Supervision can become more remote than direct and occur almost in real-time rather than periodically.

The Chairman also presented Sebi's initiatives and tools, such as Sudarsan, R(AI)DAR, and the Cybersecurity Audit Compliance Portal (C-SAC), which help the regulator monitor social media and intermediaries' advertisements, as well as analyze cybersecurity measures. He concluded that supervision must be competent, empowered, and accountable, and safeguards must surround the model. He also noted that agent AI requires strict boundaries on its actions, as AI has the potential to create its own concentration risk, and general models and providers' cloud infrastructure can become single points of failure. Predictive supervision should not create new systemic vulnerabilities when detecting old ones, and capability is a control that needs to be developed among supervisors.

Popular