DeepCybo has introduced PhysBrain 1.5, a physical foundation model that integrates embodied world understanding, action generation, and future state prediction into a single autoregressive core. This model is built upon Qwen3-VL and was enhanced with tokens for actions and visual states.
Specifically, the 8-billion parameter version demonstrates an overall score of 72.5 across 28 public benchmarks related to the embodied world. This is claimed to be the first result among open-source models and is approximately one point behind leading proprietary systems such as GPT-6 Astra (73.3) and Gemini 3.6 Flash (73.0), according to the project's published table.
According to DeepCybo's report, the PhysBrain 1.5-8B version ranks first in 14 out of 28 benchmarks and second in 10 among open-source models. These tasks cover visuospacial perception, multi-view reasoning, embodied world planning, capability grounding, and visual tracking tasks.
A lighter version, PhysBrain 1.5-2B, achieved a score of 66.6 on the same test set, serving as a compatible deployment tool rather than a primary contender in the rankings. The weights for both versions, the technical report, and the evaluation set are available on Hugging Face and GitHub under the DeepCybo / PhysBrain 1.5 project.
The training process is implemented through a closed physical loop: observation, reasoning and grounding, action execution, and then predicting world changes. Language responses, spatial structures, end-effector trajectories via ActionPiece tokens, and aligned future RGB, depth, and robot mask frames all utilize a single common objective—the next token—without using separate task heads.
Pre-training relied on videos of human interaction (in egocentric, ego-exocentric, and panoramic modes). Additional fine-tuning was conducted by mixing human demonstrations, real robot trajectories, and simulation using DeepCybo's Human-as-Humanoid action bridge.
Compared to other Chinese open lines such as Intern W0, Motus2, or Cog-WM, PhysBrain 1.5 represents the release of a foundational model with claimed leadership across multiple benchmarks, rather than just a policy demonstration for a single robot. Teams using this model are advised to re-run the evaluation suite, investigate ActionPiece transfer on their own manipulators, and view the aggregated score of 72.5 as a starting point for comparison, rather than equating proximity to proprietary systems with immediate applicability.


