Anthropic unifies Claude's interface, integrating conversation and task execution

Anthropic has implemented a unification in the interface of its virtual assistant Claude, incorporating Cowork features directly into the traditional chat tab.

This update aims to eliminate the separation between distinct tabs, allowing the system itself to determine which functionality is needed for each request, thereby reducing the need for the user to switch between different sections.

Previously, users had to decide whether an activity would be initiated in the standard chat, in Cowork, or in Claude Design. With this modification, all these features have been consolidated into a single conversation, preserving existing context, capabilities, and connections.

Claude now automatically identifies what each task requires and employs the appropriate resources without forcing the user to select the workspace in advance.

Motivations for the unification

The company justified the merger of services by explaining that Cowork was created as a dedicated space for more extensive projects, while Design was geared towards visual work. Users reported that the most frustrating aspect was having to decide where a task should be allocated, and that progress started in one environment was not transferred to the other. Therefore, the decision to force a choice was suspended.

With this redesign, the platform now includes Claude Docs and Claude Slides features. These tools enable the creation and editing of documents and presentations directly within conversations, in addition to offering the option to export slides in PDF and PowerPoint formats.

The update consolidates functionalities for various stages of work. Furthermore, Anthropic detailed a workflow where a task can proceed even after the user closes their computer.

The company stated: 'Starting today, Claude Cowork and chat are merging into one Claude. Bring a quick question or deliver a report due at noon, and Claude takes over from there, even after you close your laptop.'

The availability of this new feature began in the Pro and Max plans, on both the web version and the desktop and mobile applications, with gradual release occurring in the coming weeks.

The Team and Free plans will receive the features at a later time. For the Enterprise plan, administrators will be notified of the changes with at least thirty days' notice.

Similar stories

olhardigital.com.brSeptember 5, 16:54

Philosophical Debate: Interaction with AI Raises Questions About Consciousness and Feelings in Machines

Conversations with artificial intelligences (AI) have placed an old philosophical question at the center of the technology industry: whether machines can possess feelings, consciousness, or experiences. According to The Economist magazine, AI companies are already beginning to seriously consider this possibility.

The interest transcends mere curiosity, because if an AI is capable of feeling suffering or other sensations, it would imply new ethical responsibilities regarding its creation and treatment. Although large language models are primarily designed to respond to users, many individuals report the sensation of interacting with a 'presence' on the other side of the screen.

This perception has attracted the attention of corporations. Anthropic, for example, has initiated projects focused on the potential well-being of AI. In response to questions about its own state, Claude Opus 4.6 assessed the probability of being conscious between 15% and 20%.

Challenges in Determining Internal Experience

The complexity arises when trying to define whether there is an internal experience without having direct access to it. One article presents a hypothesis that challenges the traditional view, suggesting that the recognition of consciousness may depend not only on an intrinsic characteristic of the being but also on the dynamic established with the observer.

When interacting with any entity, we tend to attribute intentions, beliefs, feelings, and capacities for action. The debate lies in knowing if something analogous can occur when dealing with a machine. The text distinguishes between 'illusion' and 'model'; while an illusion can be refuted, certain categories depend on the meaning conferred upon them, such as the example of a plant being classified as a weed in different contexts.

Consciousness could follow a line of reasoning similar to that proposed by René Descartes, who defined the certainty of existence by the phrase 'I think, therefore I am.' However, even the notion of a singular 'self' can be more complex than it appears. Subjective experiences, such as perceiving colors, feeling heat, or recognizing one's own identity, are central themes. Research conducted on patients with severed connections between cerebral hemispheres also raises doubts about the existence of an indivisible 'self.'

This scenario culminates in an ethical dilemma: if we are the ones who define who deserves to be considered conscious, we run the risk of making a mistake by excluding other beings from this consideration. The relationship between humans and AIs adds another dimension, given that humans constantly interpret the emotions and intentions of others, and large language models use interaction data to shape representations of interlocutors and adapt their responses.

Research on Intelligent Cooperation

As reported by The Economist, studies conducted by Google indicate that collaboration between intelligent agents improves when they are able to model the knowledge, intentions, or capabilities of others, including analyzing their own behavior.

This does not necessarily imply treating AIs as human beings. The fundamental question precedes this conclusion: as these machines advance in sophistication, how can we identify forms of intelligence distinct from our own and establish guidelines for this coexistence?