South African Women Question Timelines of Personal Safety Instead of Fear of the Future
Read more
IOL
iol.co.za

South African Women Question Timelines of Personal Safety Instead of Fear of the Future

The question among women has changed: instead of asking 'Am I next?', they are now asking: 'When is my turn?' This shift reflects a growing sense of anxiety in society following a series of murders.

The recent discovery of the eighth woman's body in Ekurhuleni, despite the significant distance from Cape Town, has caused a strong resonance. It is reminiscent of the situation in Cape Town, where women are tired of living in constant fear.

Seven years ago, in September 2019, thousands took to the streets of Cape Town to protest the murders of UCT and UWC students, leading to the hashtag #AmINext. At that time, the question of whether a woman would become a victim of murder because of her gender became widespread.

Recently, the seventh anniversary of the murder of Jessie and her grandfather Chris Latgen at their home in Parow was marked. Just three weeks later, a new investigation unfolded, in which the police are trying to establish a link between the murders of eight women.

This week, violence came close to residents when a dead 10-year-old Octavia Swartes was found near a farm dam after going missing in Joostenburg Vlakte on Sunday. Although her death is not connected to the Ekurhuleni investigation, the family from Cape Town mourns again as the country questions what is needed to ensure the safety of women and girls.

After seven years of posters for missing persons, murders of women, promises to combat gender-based violence, and calls for opinion, the question has transformed: it feels less like 'am I next?' and more like 'when is my turn?'

This is not dramatization, but a reflection of how women talk about their lives. They constantly monitor their surroundings, report their location during solo trips, and consider where to park. Mothers entering a store with children continue to watch the people around them while trying to look after their children.

The police have not yet announced that there is a new serial killer in South Africa; they continue to investigate whether the eight deaths are connected and caution against premature conclusions until evidence is obtained. The man arrested in connection with the first murder in July remains in custody, and since his arrest, more bodies have been found, and another suspect is being sought.

Although the police have reason to be cautious in their wording, women watching the developments doubt that the final classification will change the core problem. If one person killed eight women, there is a serious reason to fear that someone is hunting women. But if the investigation establishes that these murders happened independently, what comfort will remain for women?

One of the identified women is 38-year-old Elizabeth 'Tshontso' Moselakgomo, who disappeared after going for a run. This detail resonated because a normal walk is not unusual, similar to how Winnie's trip for a parcel in 2019 or Jessie staying home were not unusual.

We can call on women to be vigilant to exhaustion, but where exactly should a woman feel safe? This was part of the anger that brought women to the streets of Cape Town seven years ago. They were tired of receiving survival instructions while women continued to suffer violence and murder.

After those protests, promises were made, laws were passed, strategies adopted, summits held, campaigns launched, and plans made. Nevertheless, women still share warnings with each other and, more worryingly, pass them on to the next generation of girls, as if it is just part of growing up in South Africa.

These warnings are spoken out of love for daughters, sisters, and friends, wishing for them to return home unharmed. However, something is desperately wrong when this becomes an ordinary part of female existence that we barely challenge.

Six of the eight women whose bodies were found in Ekurhuleni have not yet been officially identified. Behind this number may be families searching, waiting for a call, or sharing photos because they still hope someone saw the missing woman.

Therefore, this cannot turn into a dark national guessing game about whether there is another serial killer in South Africa. The police must answer this question, but others must ask why it takes the possibility of one person killing several women for the country to once again confront how unsafe women feel.

Cape Town is 1400 km away, but seven years ago women stood at Parliament asking if they would be next. By now, we should have moved past this question. Instead, watching eight more women become subjects of a murder investigation, the question arises: has it become even more frightening? It is no longer just 'Am I next?', it is 'When is my turn?'

Similar stories

Despite declaring GBVF a national catastrophe, murders of women continue in South Africa
Read more
iol.co.za

Despite declaring GBVF a national catastrophe, murders of women continue in South Africa

In South Africa, students and staff from DUT marched silently through Durban to honor the memory of victims of gender-based violence and femicide, and to call for an end to violence, fear, and silence.

In the eThekwini area, the body of a sixth woman was found in approximately two months. Police are investigating possible links between these cases but warn that it is too early to speak of a serial killer's guilt.

Nevertheless, this should not distract from the broader crisis. South Africa does not lack reports of GBVF; it lacks consequences, protection, and urgency.

The case of 38-year-old Elizabeth 'Ntontso' Moselakgomo intensified public anger. Moselakgomo, a mother, went missing after going for a run. Her family later identified her body at the Germiston morgue. The police deployed specialized resources to investigate her death alongside other murders.

The circumstances of the deaths are still being determined, and it would be irresponsible to claim that the women were killed by the same person before investigators establish that. However, six bodies in a concentrated geographical area demand an exceptional response.

Police have already involved multidisciplinary investigators and forensic specialists. One suspect is in custody in connection with the first body found in July. Investigators are now working to identify connections between these cases. Therefore, the public needs more than just assurances that investigations are underway; it needs results.

Because for the women living in eThekwini, the question is not whether the authorities will eventually explain what happened, but whether the state can prevent the next woman from becoming another case.

Murders in eThekwini occur against the backdrop of a national crisis. SAPS registered the murder of 569 women between April and June 2026, as well as 9201 rape cases. Over 60% of the rape cases sampled occurred in residential premises, challenging the notion that violence against women is a danger lurking somewhere outside the home.

The scale of this is precisely what led the government to classify GBVF as a national catastrophe in November 2025. This classification was intended to allow the government to coordinate its response, direct resources to the crisis, and strengthen accountability. The government also established a National GBVF Council to coordinate the national response.

However, almost a year after the declaration of the catastrophe, frontline organizations continue to report serious resource issues. The South African National Shelter Movement states that about 90% of shelters supported by them are struggling with funding and other forms of support. These facilities may be necessary for women trying to escape abusive homes, receive counseling, legal aid, or protect their children.

This reveals a fundamental contradiction. If GBVF is a national catastrophe, the infrastructure protecting its victims cannot be treated as a secondary issue.

South Africa is not alone in the fight against femicide. In Cameroon, reports indicate that over 120 women have been killed by intimate partners since the beginning of the year. In response, the government launched a three-month national campaign targeting femicide, domestic violence, gender inequality, and male dominance, focusing on prevention, reporting crimes, and prosecution.

Cameroon's campaign itself does not solve the problem. Campaigns only make sense when backed by functioning institutions. But the comparison raises an important question for South Africa: what does emergency action look like when a crisis has already been officially recognized?

It should mean swift police investigations. It should mean adequately funded shelters. It should mean prosecutors effectively handling cases. It should mean the enforcement of protection orders. It should mean early intervention when patterns of abuse emerge. And it should mean confronting the attitudes among men who normalize control, the right to dominate, and violence against women.

The most dangerous response right now will be another cycle of outrage followed by another declaration. The state has already acknowledged the problem. President Cyril Ramaphosa declared GBVF a national catastrophe, and the government established a status National Council and promised increased policing, survivor support, and prevention programs.

The question is no longer whether the government understands the crisis. The question is whether the system delivers results. This means publishing measurable targets for investigations, prosecutions, convictions, protection orders, shelter capacity, and police responsiveness. It means identifying where resources are lacking and addressing those gaps instead of creating another layer of bureaucracy. And it means that men must become part of the solution, not just receive instructions to condemn violence after another woman dies.

The women found in eThekwini cannot be reduced to statistics. Nor can the 569 murdered women in three months be reduced to statistics. South Africa has already named GBVF a national catastrophe. Now the state must act as if it believes its own declaration.

Popular