BRICS Summit in New Delhi Discusses Shift from Representation to Economic Role of Global South Countries
Read more
IOL
iol.co.za

BRICS Summit in New Delhi Discusses Shift from Representation to Economic Role of Global South Countries

During the 18th BRICS Summit in New Delhi, the trend toward a changing world economy was confirmed, according to which Global South countries refuse to remain passive participants in decisions made in other regions.

The meeting, held on September 12 and 13 in New Delhi, led to the adoption of the New Delhi Declaration. This document covers a wide range of topics, including trade, investment, finance, technology, artificial intelligence, development, food security, and the reform of global institutions. The summit demonstrated growing efforts to create practical mechanisms for cooperation among developing economies.

For India, which chaired BRICS in 2026, the key message was the demand for developing countries to move from accepting rules to shaping them. Prime Minister Narendra Modi compared this task to transforming a 'pyramid of privileges' into a 'platform for partnership,' reflecting the overall direction of BRICS: representation must transform into real economic influence.

Trade and Finance Move Closer to the Center

One of the most important aspects of the summit was financial cooperation. Despite years of speculation about creating a common currency, BRICS did not announce one. Instead, member countries continued to implement a more pragmatic approach: increasing the use of national currencies in trade, improving cross-border payment systems, and exploring possibilities for greater compatibility of digital payment infrastructure.

The New Delhi Declaration also supports financing in local currencies through the New Development Bank and further work on the BRICS investment platform. India proposed creating the BRICS Risk Laboratory in the Gujarat International Financial Technology Centre, and the other members supported efforts to improve the investment climate among BRICS countries.

This is significant because reducing dependence on a single financial system does not require the immediate creation of a new world currency; the process can begin with more practical steps, such as simplifying trade, investment, and settlements for businesses in emerging markets using their own currencies. For companies operating in Africa, Asia, the Middle East, and Latin America, this could potentially reduce transaction costs and open up new avenues for trade and investment.

A More Integrated Economy of the Global South

Industrial growth and technology were also cemented on the BRICS agenda at the summit. Chinese President Xi Jinping called for deepening economic interaction and put forward initiatives in artificial intelligence, trade, and industrial development. China also proposed creating a BRICS AI Open Source Zone, emphasizing the growing importance of technological cooperation among developing countries.

The significance extends beyond just AI. Developing countries face a typical problem: they possess natural resources, growing consumer markets, and young demographics, but remain low in global value chains. Cooperation in technology, manufacturing, digital infrastructure, and production capacity can help BRICS economies shift from raw material exports to higher value-added production. This is particularly relevant for Africa.

For South Africa and the entire continent, BRICS cooperation is increasingly linked to the question of whether African economies can leverage their ties with major emerging markets to accelerate industrialization, infrastructure development, and value addition. President Cyril Ramaphosa consistently places these issues at the center of South Africa's participation in BRICS, including strengthening intra-bloc trade and investment, industrialization, infrastructure, and economic opportunities related to the African Continental Free Trade Area.

The opportunities are vast: Africa possesses critical minerals, agricultural potential, renewable energy resources, and one of the world's fastest-growing consumer populations. The strategic question is how to link these advantages with capital, technology, infrastructure, and markets. BRICS could become one of the platforms for building these connections.

Reforming the Global Economic System

The political aspect of the summit was no less important. BRICS leaders once again called for the reform of global governance institutions, including the UN Security Council and the international financial architecture, to ensure greater representation for developing countries. Russian President Vladimir Putin insisted on strengthening the representation of Asia, Africa, and Latin America in global decision-making, while Xi Jinping advocated for a fairer international order.

This is not just a matter of gaining seats in existing structures; it reflects a broader assertion that the distribution of economic power has changed faster than the structures governing the international system. BRICS countries are increasingly striving for their economic weight to be reflected in the rules governing trade, finance, development, and international decision-making.

A Broader Political Voice

The New Delhi Declaration also addressed major international conflicts, including the situation in the Middle East and Palestine, calling for diplomacy, sovereignty, and peaceful resolution of disputes. BRICS members opposed the forced displacement of Palestinians and called for the activation of diplomatic efforts to prevent conflict.

The importance of this lies in the fact that BRICS is increasingly providing a platform through which Global South countries can voice their positions on international affairs outside traditional Western political blocs. Its members do not share identical foreign policies, and they do not have to. The strength of BRICS partly lies in the fact that countries with different political systems, economic structures, and strategic interests can still find areas of common interest—especially in development, sovereignty, trade, investment, and a more representative international system.

What Comes Next

Thus, the New Delhi summit marks another stage in the evolution of BRICS. The bloc started as a platform connecting major developing economies, and its expansion has turned it into a much broader group of the Global South, uniting major economies from Africa, Asia, the Middle East, and Latin America.

The next stage will focus on implementation. The true measure of BRICS will increasingly be determined by concluded agreements, financed infrastructure, utilized payment systems, cross-border investments, transferred technologies, and built industries. This is especially significant for Africa. BRICS can provide access to markets, capital, technology, and strategic partnerships, but African countries will need to negotiate from a position of economic strategy, utilizing the African Continental Free Trade Area, regional economic communities, and national industrial policy to ensure that greater South-South trade leads to local production, employment, and increased value addition.

The New Delhi summit shifted the BRICS discussion from the question of whether the group challenges the existing world order. A more important question arises: can BRICS help build a world economy where developing countries have a greater ability to determine what they produce, where they trade, how they finance development, and how they participate in the industries of the future? The direction chosen in New Delhi indicates that this is becoming an increasingly ambitious goal. For the Global South, this transition from representation to economic agency may ultimately be BRICS's most important contribution.

Similar stories

BRICS economic volume surpasses G7 figures, signaling a shift towards a multipolar world order
Read more
iol.co.za

BRICS economic volume surpasses G7 figures, signaling a shift towards a multipolar world order

For a long time, the G7 was considered the measure of the world's economic center of gravity. However, this established view is being questioned based on recent data. According to information presented by BRICS representatives and published in various sources, the total economic output of the BRICS bloc, calculated using purchasing power parity, has surpassed the G7 figures. Although this is not entirely a new phenomenon, BRICS first overtook the G7 in this metric between 2019 and 2020, depending on the dataset used. Nevertheless, the gap continues to widen, and BRICS leaders openly discuss this as evidence of the world's transition to a more multipolar system.

Recently, Russian President Vladimir Putin referenced data from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) indicating that the total GDP of BRICS, adjusted for purchasing power, is approximately 77 trillion US dollars, while the G7 figure is estimated at around 57 trillion US dollars. Other analysts estimate BRICS' share of global GDP to be between 32% and 35%, whereas the G7's share ranges from twenty to just over thirty percent. Regardless of the exact figures, the trend remains constant: BRICS' share is steadily growing, while the G7's share is declining from a level that constituted about 45 percent of the global volume in the early 1990s.

A Stronger Voice for the Global South

Ben Webbert, Deputy Sherpa of BRICS from South Africa, characterized the bloc as a consolidated voice of the Global South. He noted efforts to strengthen policy coordination and involve youth and scientists in shaping state thought. Russian diplomats expanded this concept, presenting BRICS as a genuine pillar of the emerging multipolar system, asserting that differences in the group's political and economic models should not impede its joint work.

This conceptual framework has practical implications. Since China and India are demonstrating faster growth compared to most G7 economies, developing countries are increasingly viewing BRICS institutions, including its New Development Bank, summits, and the push for local currency trade, as an alternative to Western-led financial mechanisms. For African, Latin American, and some Asian countries, the strengthening of BRICS could mean the emergence of additional opportunities: alternative creditors, alternative trading partners, and greater influence when negotiating with the IMF, World Bank, or Western governments in general.

For G7 countries, the situation calls more for adjustment than panic. Members of this group are aging, growing slowly, and no longer possess the overwhelming share of global production they once did. This does not mean they have lost influence over global rules and institutions; they still largely determine conditions in trade, finance, and technology, but it implies that their influence will increasingly require negotiation rather than being assumed automatically.

The future development will depend less on GDP tables than on what BRICS can do with its growing weight. The decisive factor will be the ability to translate economic scale into functioning institutions, coordinated positions in organizations such as the UN and WTO, and the creation of real alternatives to dollar-based finance. This will determine whether this statistical shift becomes a genuine change in global power or remains merely striking statistics quietly bypassed by Western economies in real practice.

Popular