Ashnir Grover states that introducing a fee for UPI is tax collection, and the government is misleading
Read more
Aaj Tak
www.aajtak.in

Ashnir Grover states that introducing a fee for UPI is tax collection, and the government is misleading

Ashnir Grover, co-founder of BharatPe and former judge on Shark Tank India, spoke out against the debate over the Merchant Discount Rate (MDR) on UPI, proposing a new formula that caused widespread resonance. Simultaneously, the opposition is also criticizing the government regarding UPI.

Speculation arose after it became known about the possible introduction of MDR or a commission for UPI transactions exceeding 2000 rupees. The government issued a notification clarifying that banks or payment systems cannot charge fees for UPI transactions up to 2000 rupees or for payments made using RuPay debit cards. However, this notification lacks clear information regarding the charging of fees for UPI transactions exceeding 2000 rupees.

It was this gap in information that prompted Ashnir Grover to ask the government several sharp questions. He stated on the social network X that any commission for UPI is equivalent to tax collection. Although everyone acknowledges UPI as a significant achievement for India, it now risks becoming subject to taxation.

Grover noted that the RBI provides the government with a surplus of 2.87 lakh crore, and the profit of all registered banks amounts to 4.11 lakh crore. Furthermore, NPCI, the operator of UPI, has a surplus of 1.888 crore. He questioned the necessity of introducing MDR given such significant revenues for the government and banks, and asked what specific subsidy the government is trying to compensate through UPI.

He also pointed out that the cost of operating ATMs and cash logistics in India is 30,500 crore. Grover advised that if the goal is to optimize closed ATMs and promote UPI, they should simply close the ATMs and focus exclusively on UPI.

According to the new rules introduced on September 14, banks or payment applications are not entitled to charge direct or indirect fees for UPI transactions or RuPay debit cards up to 2000 rupees. An amendment was introduced to Section 10A of the Payments Act during the monsoon session of parliament, paving the way for the introduction of MDR on electronic payments. Now, the 'UPI and Services Management Committee', headed by NPCI, will determine the amount of the MDR commission to be charged.

The government argues that since UPI has become a very large system, funds are necessary for its secure operation. Processing a huge volume of transactions requires constant investment in cybersecurity and fraud prevention. The government believes that relying solely on government subsidies for the further expansion of UPI is impossible.

Similar stories

Central government bans banks from charging fees for UPI transactions up to 2000 rupees
Read more
www.aajtak.in

Central government bans banks from charging fees for UPI transactions up to 2000 rupees

The central government has issued a strict directive to banks and system providers prohibiting the charging of any fees for UPI transactions up to 2000 rupees.

According to the Ministry of Finance, this legal restriction was introduced in accordance with Section 10A of the Payment and Settlement Systems Act of 2007. This rule ensures that no direct or indirect charge will be levied on any person making or receiving payments using debit cards or UPI up to 2000 rupees.

This step has been taken to ensure the smooth functioning of the digital economy. Earlier in August, the government hinted at the possible introduction of a small Merchant Discount Rate (MDR) for certain UPI transactions by merchants exceeding the set limit. At the same time, the government assured the public that peer-to-peer payments would remain completely free.

The government emphasized that this change is part of broader efforts to ensure the sustainability, competitiveness, and support of India's growing digital economy. The Ministry of Finance firmly refuted reports claiming that external forces were behind the proposed changes, calling such statements unfounded, false, and misleading. The government clearly stated that strengthening the country's digital infrastructure remains its primary objective.

Popular