Brazil presents a notable paradox: it is a global powerhouse in biodiversity, possesses a vast tradition in the use of medicinal plants, and has a high-level scientific community. However, this combination of factors has yet to result in patents, innovative medicines, or value-added products for society.
It is essential that biodiversity be seen not only as an environmental heritage but also as a strategic infrastructure for health, science, and the development of the bioeconomy. This implies using ecosystems sustainably to generate knowledge and high-value products, while ensuring the inclusion of communities holding traditional knowledge.
There are few success stories in this transition in Brazil. The most prominent example is captopril®, used against arterial hypertension, whose development stemmed from initial studies by Professor Sérgio Henrique Ferreira at the Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto at USP. He utilized the venom of the Bothrops jararaca snake, contributing to understanding the mechanisms of hypertension and the development of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.
Other examples include phytotherapics such as the anti-inflammatory Acheflan®, made with Cordia verbenacea leaves; the cough syrup Melagrião®, based on Mikania glomerata; and the sedative Sintocalmy®, derived from Passiflora incarnata. However, among 20 phytotherapics registered with Anvisa analyzed between 2016 and 2026, these three are the only ones developed internally, while the others come from imported plants, mainly from Europe and Asia.
Although the responsible group developed the preclinical studies for these three natural medicines, demonstrating the viability of transforming botanical knowledge into safe and effective commercial products, they remain exceptions given Brazil's immense biodiversity and research volume.
The Brazilian regulatory framework, such as Law No. 13.123/2015, establishes norms for access to genetic heritage and associated traditional knowledge, including benefit-sharing mechanisms. The main obstacle, according to one expert, lies in harmonizing the protection of biodiversity, respect for community rights, and the creation of an environment conducive to research and innovation.
Articles in renowned scientific journals, such as Nature Medicine, emphasize the need to integrate various forms of evidence, including clinical trials, comparative effectiveness studies, and real-world data, in addition to advanced tools like artificial intelligence, genomics, and proteomics to analyze traditional therapies.
Experiences from China and India point to the need for an integrated and long-term strategy. China, for example, launched a comprehensive state policy in March 2025 to enhance the quality of its traditional medicines. This policy covers everything from protecting medicinal species and establishing databases to industrial modernization and the direct link between science, innovation, and development.
The Chinese strategy focuses on chronic and infectious diseases, using an approach that integrates patents, trademarks, and the protection of traditional knowledge. In comparison, Brazil has public policies since 2006, universities, and regulatory agencies, but lacks a cohesive long-term strategy that connects the development of standardized extracts to registration with Anvisa and industrial production.
Despite vast Brazilian scientific production—with 63 thousand articles published on plants in the last ten years—the conversion of this knowledge into medicines is modest. A patent study revealed only 25 applications involving native plants between 2003 and 2008, many originating from national institutions but not materializing into products due to a lack of collaboration with industry.
The core of the problem is not the generation of knowledge, but rather the difficulty in converting it into intellectual property, regulated products, and technologies accessible to the market. Given Brazil's biological wealth, which hosts about 20% of known species worldwide, and its cultural diversity, the country has the potential to lead, but urgently needs a unified State policy.

