Akash Chopra reveals the reason for Mohammad Shami's absence from the Indian squad: it's not about age
Read more
Aaj Tak
www.aajtak.in

Akash Chopra reveals the reason for Mohammad Shami's absence from the Indian squad: it's not about age

The question of fast bowler Mohammad Shami's return to the Indian team remains uncertain. Shami, who is 36 years old, has been outside the Indian squad for about a year and a half, and his problems have worsened in recent years due to injuries. The selection committee, led by Ajit Agarkar, favors younger options in the fast bowling attack, which constantly raises the question of whether Shami's age is the main obstacle in his path.

However, former Indian cricketer Akash Chopra disagrees with this view. He believes that reducing the reason for Mohammad Shami's absence solely to age is incorrect. Citing Australian fast bowler Mitchell Starc as an example, he noted significant differences in the status of these two players.

In a video published on CREX, Akash Chopra stated: 'Mitchell Starc remained fit for a long time and consistently played cricket. Every time he took the field, he led the Australian attack, so there are few grounds to question his fitness, physical condition, or bowling.'

In contrast, Mohammad Shami has suffered from injuries recently. After surgery, he had to refrain from cricket for a long time. Although he scored points in domestic cricket after returning, his bowling did not demonstrate the previous speed and sharpness. According to Chopra, in Shami's case, selectors must consider not only his age but also his current physical condition and the quality of his bowling.

Akash Chopra clearly stated that if age were the sole reason for Mohammad Shami's absence, then players like Virat Kohli and Rohit Sharma, who are older than him, would not be in the squad. He emphasized that excluding a player solely on the basis of age is illogical. Although age cannot be considered the primary reason for Shami's exclusion, only the selectors can explain why he is not included in the team in the future.

Recently, Mohammad Shami represented the East Zone in the Duleep Trophy 2026-27 final. This final was particularly important for Shami as he played his 100th first-class match. His achievement was noted, and he achieved victory in the championship with the East Zone team. Thus, Shami is still active in competitive cricket. However, whether his performances in domestic matches alone will be enough for a return to the international level depends on the assessment of the selectors.

Mohammad Shami's main task now is to prove his complete physical readiness and restore his former pace. If he consistently performs effectively in domestic cricket and strengthens confidence in his physical condition, it will become harder for him to ignore his claims before the selectors.

Similar stories

Imaran Tahir impresses CPL at age 47, taking 5 wickets against Saint Lucia Kings
Read more
www.aajtak.in

Imaran Tahir impresses CPL at age 47, taking 5 wickets against Saint Lucia Kings

The cricketer demonstrated that age is not a determining factor by performing at the age of 47. During the Caribbean Premier League (CPL) match on September 10th at Providence Stadium, Imaran Tahir showcased his masterful spin bowling.

Tahir, captain of the Guyana Amazon Warriors, played against the Saint Lucia Kings and secured a victory for his team, reducing the opponents to 119 runs. He took 5 wickets while conceding only 17 runs.

The Saint Lucia Kings started the game by winning the toss and batting first. Although the team initially scored quickly, the Guyanese spinners soon gained control of the game. In his four-over spell, Imaran Tahir conceded only 17 runs and dismissed five batsmen, maintaining an economy rate of just 4.25 runs per over. Additionally, Mehdi Hasan Miraj also performed well, taking 3 wickets for 13 runs in 4 overs.

Tahir dismissed one of Saint Lucia's main run-scorers, Kamila Purana, who was given out LBW after scoring 43 runs. He subsequently dismissed captain Roston Chadge using LBW as well. Tahir continued his streak by bowling out Mackenzie Clark and Matthew Ford with clean bowled deliveries. His fifth wicket came when Joshua Bishop was given out LBW; the batsman could not recognize the decision upon review, and the decision favored the bowler.

Despite the Saint Lucia Kings being in a critical position, having lost 7 wickets for 73 runs, Tahir's and Mehdi Hasan Miraj's spin bowling prevented the batsmen from playing freely. However, Obas Pinar somewhat eased the pressure, scoring 35 runs off 28 balls, including 4 fours and one six. He was supported by Mahish Tikshna, who remained not out, scoring 6 runs off 11 balls, allowing the team to reach a total of 119 runs in 18.5 overs.

A notable aspect of this performance was that Tahir acted not only as the team captain but also as its main asset. Delivering such a spell in T20 cricket at the age of 47 is a significant achievement in itself. In addition to Tahir's five wickets against the Saint Lucia Kings, Mehdi Hasan Miraj took another 3 wickets, and Dwen Prietorius took one. The success was also highlighted by Romario Shefard.

Selection of Indian squad players sparked controversy: S. Badri Nat questioned the inclusion of Washington Sundar and Nitish Kumar Reddy
Read more
www.aajtak.in

Selection of Indian squad players sparked controversy: S. Badri Nat questioned the inclusion of Washington Sundar and Nitish Kumar Reddy

Discussions regarding the player selection process began after the announcement of the Indian team's squad for the three-match T20I series against Afghanistan. Former Indian player S. Badri Nat raised questions concerning the inclusion of Washington Sundar and Nitish Kumar Reddy in the team. Furthermore, he indirectly pointed to head coach Gautam Gambhir.

Badri Nat shared his opinion on the selection, casting doubt on the consistent support received by Sundar. On his YouTube channel, he noted that it seems like the 'coach's favourite' has returned once again. Badri Nat advised Sundar to take advantage of this trust.

Badri Nat's implied hint was directed at the team management and, specifically, the coaching staff. However, he did not level direct accusations against Gautam Gambhir.

Badri Nat also spoke about Nitish Kumar Reddy, focusing his criticism on his bowling performance. He stated that he does not rate Nitish highly, and the reason for this is his bowling. In Badri Nat's view, Nitish is fundamentally a batter, not a all-rounder who should be highly valued for his bowling skills. Thus, Badri Nat's objection is more related to Nitish's bowling abilities than his batting.

Washington and Nitish were included in the Indian team's 15-man squad for the T20I matches against Afghanistan. The first match of the series is scheduled for September 13 in Delhi. This series takes place during a period when the Indian team is making several changes ahead of defending its gold medalist status at the Asian Games, which will be held in Japan at the end of this month.

The series against Afghanistan is also considered important for assessing the team composition and testing the players. Alongside the criticism of the selection, Badri Nat expressed satisfaction with the possible return of Jasprit Bumrah to the Indian team, calling it positive news. Bumrah has been included in the squad for the series against Afghanistan, but his participation depends on receiving clearance from the BCCI Centre of Excellence.

Additionally, Harshit Rana was included in the team. The participation of Bumrah, Washington Sundar, Nitish Kumar Reddy, and Harshit Rana in the series depends on passing the respective medical examinations. The first match of the three-match T20I series between India and Afghanistan will take place on September 13 in Delhi. In this series, the Indian team will be preparing for the Asian Games, while everyone will be watching for Bumrah's possible return. Nevertheless, the selection of players like Washington Sundar and Nitish Kumar Reddy has already caused heated debate before the start of the series.

Popular