Film about the rescue of the Dalai Lama from Tibet, shot in Nepal, sparks Chinese protest and is set for release in India
Read more
Aaj Tak
www.aajtak.in

Film about the rescue of the Dalai Lama from Tibet, shot in Nepal, sparks Chinese protest and is set for release in India

In Indian cinemas, the film titled Four Rivers, Six Ranges will premiere on September 11. Its plot touches upon not just a historical event, but a highly sensitive geopolitical issue relevant today. The director is Tibetan filmmaker Shenpen Khimsar, who was born in Darjeeling. However, China has expressed strong disapproval of this film.

The film narrates the flight of the Dalai Lama from Tibet to India in 1959, as well as the role of fighters from the Tibetan opposition organization Chushi Gangdruk, who ensured his safety. This organization provided the film's title, as Chushi Gangdruk means 'four rivers and six mountain ranges' in Tibet. This name is associated with the Kham region in Eastern Tibet and later became linked to the Tibetan armed resistance movement.

Central to the film are the warriors of this movement who participated in the mission to safely evacuate the Dalai Lama from Tibet to India in 1959. Interestingly, the father of producer Dorji Wangdi Devatsanga was also among those who helped the Dalai Lama leave Tibet. The film's story is inspired by the book 'Flight at the Cuckoo’s Behest.'

The director spent years researching the material, meeting with elderly veterans of this resistance and their families, who were direct witnesses to those events. Nevertheless, creating the film proved more difficult than writing the script. The main challenge was the filming location.

Filming took place in the Mustang region of Nepal, which is very close to the Chinese border. According to Shenpen Khimsar, obtaining permission to film a movie concerning Tibet, the Dalai Lama, or anti-Chinese activities in Nepal was extremely difficult. He noted that China exerts significant pressure on Nepal, making direct approval for such films virtually impossible.

Therefore, the film crew had to resort to an unconventional solution. Instead of presenting an official script detailing the true story, Khimsar presented the Nepalese officials with a fictional script titled 'The Himalayan Robin Hood.' It was based on this permit that the real film Four Rivers Six Ranges was shot.

The shooting process did not adhere to the standard schedule for such a historical action film, which usually takes one and a half to two months. Khimsar and his team completed the entire project in just 19 days. This was done in the high-altitude Himalayan region, at an altitude of about 15,000 feet, under harsh weather conditions and limited resources.

Reports indicate that the film's budget was around sixty million rupees. Completing the project in 19 days, despite the high altitude, modest budget, the use of first-time actors, and security issues, is one of the most remarkable aspects of this project.

The reason for China's strong indignation is directly related to the content and political viewpoint of the film. It depicts Tibetan warriors taking up arms to defend their faith, land, and the Dalai Lama, reflecting a view of Tibetan history through the lens of Tibetan resistance and the pursuit of independence. China's reaction was extremely sharp.

Chinese state media published a lengthy article about the film on August 20 under the headline 'Four Rivers, Six Ranges: A fictitious rewrite of Xizang's history.' In it, they alleged distortion of history. China linked the film to an attempt to present Tibet separately from China and to a narrative of separatism. The Chinese side asserts that Tibet has always been an integral part of China, and the film attempts to dispute this historical fact.

The director himself has spoken out actively on this matter. During the launch of the Indian trailer in August, Khimsar stated that the Chinese government was trying to stop the film's screening.

The release of the film in India is also significant because its theme is directly connected to the history of India itself. In 1959, the Dalai Lama left Tibet and arrived in India, and his life in exile remains an important part of the Tibetan political question to this day. Four Rivers Six Ranges seeks to portray this escape not through diplomatic documents, but through the eyes of ordinary Tibetan fighters who helped safely transport the Dalai Lama across dangerous mountain passes.

Thus, the film tells not only about the Dalai Lama but also about people whose names are relatively rarely mentioned in mainstream historiography. The film is not a product of a major studio; it is an English-language project created with a limited budget, involving many Tibetan actors. Navazuddin Siddiqui voiced a character in Hindi, and Hollywood actor and Tibetan supporter Richard Gere also supported the film.

Similar stories

China restricts information about natural disaster in Nepal using methods similar to the pandemic period
Read more
www.aajtak.in

China restricts information about natural disaster in Nepal using methods similar to the pandemic period

In the wake of devastating floods and landslides on the border of Nepal and Tibet, China is exhibiting the same reaction as during the coronavirus pandemic. At the beginning of the epidemic in 2020, when local doctors and citizens tried to report the truth, officials forced them into silence, accusing them of spreading 'fake news.' A similar suppression is occurring now: alarming videos and photos from the Girong Pass in Tibet are actively being deleted from social media, while state media only publishes official pictures of rescue operations.

China is extremely cautious about its image, so it does not allow footage and videos from the disaster site to be released. Any attempts to spread such information are controlled by China's cybersecurity team. China's cybersecurity police have reported cracking down on 10 cases related to alleged rumors of a landslide in Girong, southwestern China in Tibet.

According to Chinese authorities, some individuals are spreading false information about the disaster, exaggerating the number of casualties and misleading the public. In such cases, China takes action against 10 people. China operates a system where any data on fatalities that does not match official statistics leads to action by state structures, including imprisonment and fines.

Under Chinese law, intentionally spreading rumors about natural disasters can result in up to 10 days of detention and a fine of up to 1000 yuan; in serious cases, imprisonment for 3 to 7 years is possible. In one incident, the cybersecurity police discovered that an internet user under the nickname 'Q' spread a rumor on an online platform without evidence that 'it is reported that 1400 people died, but in reality, 3000 people are missing.' Consequently, local police fined 'Q' administratively.

In another similar case, a user named 'Liu' published a post stating that 'more than 3000 people died on the Chinese side.' The Chinese side refutes this statement and fines Liu. Furthermore, China claims that the number of fatalities in this disaster was only 16 people, which seems unrealistic for such a major event.

An internet user named 'Zhang' claimed that 'more than 1000 people were swept away by the current.' Zhang also added that hundreds of workers, builders, tourists, and cross-border travelers were present in the area, and that the actual number of victims could exceed 1000. Chinese police deemed this information false and took action against Zhang.

China's system functions in an atmosphere of secrecy and fear. Moreover, the issue of Tibet is extremely sensitive for China, as Tibet has been under Chinese control since the 1950s. Any event, even a natural disaster, is viewed as a political phenomenon because it calls into question China's policies and development programs, and raises environmental issues. If footage and sounds from the scene leak out, it could shed light on the situation in Tibet, which the Chinese government wishes to avoid.

China views this disaster through the prism of narrative control. Beijing insists that the disaster originated on the Nepalese side and rejects warnings about the need to audit dams being built in the Himalayan regions of Tibet, calling them 'fake news.' China fears that an assessment of the real damage could negatively affect the party's image. Information control makes it difficult for families to receive news about relatives. Censorship is widespread in China regarding sensitive issues such as Tibet, Taiwan, and Hong Kong, and in the case of a natural disaster, the official version of events prevails.

Flooding in Nepal: Video from the customs office at the China-Nepal border, people are running
Read more
www.aajtak.in

Flooding in Nepal: Video from the customs office at the China-Nepal border, people are running

Devastating scenes are observed in Nepal that are hard to believe, as if they were filmed in a movie. As a result of this disaster, the customs office located at the Kerung border was washed away by water. This route is the path through which containers arrive in Nepal from China. Video footage is available.

Popular