Springboks veteran Pieter-Steph du Toit will join the club of players with a hundred matches after his one hundred and first test against the All Blacks in Cape Town on Saturday. If experience matters in international rugby, then the Springboks are set to field the most experienced starting lineup in their 105-year history during the second of the greatest rivalry clashes in Cape Town.
If Siya Kolisi is selected for the game, the Boks' starting fifteen will demonstrate an impressive 1012 caps in tests, surpassing any previous Springboks starting lineup since South Africa's first test in 1891. This figure comprises 428 matches in the backline and 584 in the forwards, plus another 204 potential matches among the substitutes.
The overall experience is enhanced by the outstanding performances of Eben Etzebeth with 142 matches, Kolisi with 104, as well as the recent centenaries of Damian de Allende and Pieter-Steph du Toit, who will mark his one hundred and first match on Saturday.
The Greatest Rugby Rivalry
These players do not participate in ceremonial appearances, as all four remain key performers at the highest level. Their leadership and experience in crucial matches are invaluable to the Springboks team, which seeks to respond after the 33-16 defeat last week in Ellis Park. This loss also allowed the All Blacks to overtake the Boks and regain the top spot in the world rankings, intensifying South Africa's determination.
Coach Rassie Erasmus stated on Monday that his team would seek immediate revenge in Cape Town. He noted: 'I don't think the score reflects what happened in Ellis Park. There were moments when I felt we were dominating... but it's true, we couldn't convert those opportunities.'
Erasmus added that much of the problems were caused by themselves, which is causing frustration within the camp. He acknowledged that the All Blacks are a very strong team and currently hold the number one spot in the world, and they know they are the team pursuing them in an attempt to reclaim the top spot. Erasmus also admitted that the highly rated 'Bombardment unit' failed to have the desired impact because the starting fifteen could not win the game when chances arose.
'We didn't get what we wanted from the bench because the players who started couldn't convert... our plans didn't work, and that's on me,' he said. 'We—and I include the coaches—didn't give these guys a platform to really finish things off. They had to chase the game.'
Erasmus agreed that the All Blacks ultimately improvised their tactics better in the match. 'The All Blacks imposed their game plan on us, and they were better than us here. For them, it was a beautiful game; for us, it was a highly competitive game for 60 minutes, and then they beat us. I know we are all sitting here, we have a big deficit of 17 points. But then, when they had two or three chances, as in most years when we played them, they converted them.'


