Against the general trend of decline, closures, and reductions in print publications, the launch of a new national newspaper in South Africa might seem like a risky venture. However, the author argues the opposite, believing that the publication 'The National,' which released its first print run on August 16, deserves support precisely because of the industry's problems.
This is a rare example of a media company willing to invest significant resources in convincing people that journalism retains both commercial and civic value. The publication is supported by the Sekunjalo group, whose CEO Lucien Jacobs stated that this is part of a broader strategy to develop national, regional, and vernacular publishing, with expansion financed by strategic partners from the US and Europe.
The newspaper has chosen the protea, South Africa's national flower, as its image—a flower that blooms not in spite of difficulties, but because it has survived fire and drought. This symbol reflects the idea of resilience and the belief that complex, quiet stories of recovery and progress in the country deserve as much attention as crisis events.
Print is changing, not just disappearing
Many have heard the assertion that 'print is dead,' and it is easy to make that judgment by looking at circulation charts. However, such a view misses a more interesting question. The core issue is not whether print will return to the scale of twenty years ago—it will not—but whether it still serves any function in modern, multi-platform media consumption.
The author believes that print remains important, provided the newspaper is not modeled after 1998. Print provides authority, consistency, and a physical connection with the reader that an endless news feed cannot replicate. Digital platforms offer immediacy, reach, and data; social networks provide distribution and communication; and video and audio open new ways of presenting the same story. The potential lies in combining these formats, rather than viewing print as the sole product, which seems to be 'The National's' gamble.
South Africa needs more voices, not fewer
Media diversity matters for reasons extending beyond the financial health of any single company. When an editorial office closes, something more than a business is lost: journalists lose their jobs, institutional memory disappears, and fewer reporters attend council meetings, court hearings, and parliamentary committees. Fewer people observe the activities of businesses and government institutions.
This reduction should concern every resident of South Africa, not just media workers. The solution is not to reduce the number of journalists or competing outlets, but to improve the quality of journalism, which must actively fight for audience trust. The protea has over eighty varieties, each unique yet recognizably belonging to the same resilient family; the South African media landscape functions similarly and requires this spectrum, not a handful of remaining voices trying to say everything.
'The National' will have to earn this trust, as will any other player. However, the market should welcome a competitor willing to try something new, especially since a new national title means creating new jobs. These jobs are needed not only by reporters and editors whose names appear in the paper but also by photographers, designers, proofreaders, printers, distributors, technologists, and sales staff whose work happens behind the scenes. South Africa needs experienced journalists, but it also needs a place where the next generation can learn this profession. Without active editorial offices, such a path does not exist.
The business model must change this time
At the same time, the economic reality cannot be ignored. 'The National' will face the same structural difficulties as any other publisher: advertisers demand measurable audiences, agencies require accountability, readers are distributed across various platforms, and digital advertising costs are rising while printing and distribution costs remain stubbornly high. Therefore, the newspaper cannot measure itself by the number of copies printed.
Its true currency is the audience—the combined weight of print runs, digital users, video views, social media reach, newsletter subscribers, and event attendees. If sold this way, the offering to advertisers changes: they are buying not a page, but access to an identifiable audience across multiple touchpoints simultaneously. This is where the real commercial potential lies.
New players force the industry to self-reflect
Competition brings benefits that go beyond simply adding another publication to the newsstand. It forces existing publishers to ask more complex questions about their own products. Are they innovating fast enough? Do they understand young readers? Do their business models meet advertiser expectations? Do their editorial teams reflect the country they cover?
Innovation rarely arises from a desire to protect the status quo; it more often appears when someone decides that there is still room for a different approach in a complex market. The success of 'The National' will depend on its readers, advertisers, and the journalism it produces, but it has earned the chance to compete for all three elements.
There will be, and already are, discussions regarding 'The National's' ownership and intentions. This is appropriate: a newspaper planning to hold others accountable must itself be prepared for such scrutiny. Any new publication backed by a large financially interested group raises questions about editorial independence, and readers are right to ask them instead of blindly trusting. However, criticizing owners and being pessimistic about the entire project are different things, and it would be strange to mourn the decline of journalism while automatically suspecting anyone willing to invest in its reversal.
South African media needs investment, jobs, a young audience, new business models, and, most importantly, competition. Launching a newspaper in 2026 is a risk; entrepreneurship has never been about entering a market with guaranteed success, and sometimes the biggest opportunities arise precisely when common wisdom has already deemed the industry hopeless.
Perhaps the right question is not 'why would anyone launch a newspaper now?' but 'what could a newspaper launched now do differently?' If 'The National' can answer this question—by providing credible journalism, real distribution, digital literacy, audience understanding, and commercial discipline simultaneously—its appearance will be more significant than just another title on the shelf. It will prove that the future of South African journalism should not be determined solely by what is closing; it can be determined by what we are ready to build—and, like the flower 'The National' chose as its symbol, by what is ready to take root deeper and bloom precisely because the soil was difficult.
}, {