Against the backdrop of the development of India's aviation sector, the Federation of Indian Pilots (FIP) has submitted an appeal to Prime Minister Narendra Modi requesting the establishment of a new, independent Civil Aviation Administration (CAA). They argue that modernizing the country's regulatory system is necessary to match the expansion of the industry. Nepal, Sri Lanka, and the Maldives were cited as examples.
The Chairman of FIP, Captain CS Randava, noted that India, having become the third-largest domestic aviation market in the world, remains an exception among major regional economies because it is still dependent on the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), which is an attached office of the Ministry of Civil Aviation.
The proposal suggests introducing a modern, autonomous, and legally independent regulator instead of the DGCA, possessing greater financial, administrative, and technical freedom.
FIP emphasized that the aviation sector has transformed into one of the fastest-growing areas, contributing to economic development, trade, tourism, and national connectivity. As air traffic constantly grows and aviation technologies become more complex, they believe India requires a modern, independent, and professionally managed regulatory structure to maintain high standards of safety, efficiency, and consumer rights.
It should be noted that the civil aviation sector in India has experienced significant boom over the last two decades. Currently, the commercial fleet in this sector comprises over 850 aircraft, and the number of passengers has exceeded 239 million. The complexity of regulating aviation has also increased with the emergence of new areas such as drones and advanced aerial mobility.
FIP acknowledged the important role of the DGCA in regulating the sector, but its status as an attached office of the Ministry of Civil Aviation created limitations in administrative autonomy, financial flexibility, hiring of technical specialists, and timely decision-making.
The proposal outlined numerous reasons for creating a separate Civil Aviation Administration. FIP pointed to the limited administrative independence of the DGCA, as key regulatory decisions require Ministry approval. Furthermore, its financial powers are restricted by government procedures, and recruitment and procurement are subject to lengthy governmental processes.
The proposal also addressed the difficulties in attracting and retaining aviation experts in public service. Supervising civil aviation requires specialists in areas such as airline captaincy, flight operations inspection, aeronautical engineering, air traffic control, human factors, and fatigue management. According to FIP, salaries in public service may be lower than those of experienced professionals working in the aviation industry, which hinders the attraction and long-term retention of highly qualified personnel.



