Discussions have intensified in Uzbekistan regarding the introduction of new rules for identifying agricultural animals. The question arises whether this measure will be a catalyst for progress in the industry or merely increase the administrative burden on livestock owners.
Experts agree that the digitalization of the animal husbandry sector is necessary, but they emphasize the importance of considering the real working conditions of farmers and herders during its implementation.
According to Uzhydromet specialist Erkin Abdulakhatov, a modern animal accounting system is necessary for the state because it will allow for more accurate information on herd size, effective tracking of the industry's condition, and better planning of support measures. Nevertheless, he warns that the introduction of this system should not turn into an additional bureaucratic obligation for livestock breeders.
Currently, the industry faces several serious challenges, including climate change, deterioration of pasture conditions, water and feed shortages. Instead of measures to stimulate animal husbandry, new requirements are emerging that may demotivate farmers from keeping livestock.
Erkin Abdulakhatov points out that in other countries, electronic databases, veterinary information systems, geospatial technologies, and remote monitoring methods are used for herd accounting. This raises the question of the advisability of placing the majority of the registration and counting work directly on the owners.
He believes that trust in such a system will increase if the state itself uses modern technologies for data collection and verification. For example, if the system can determine the number of animals in remote mountainous areas without constant reliance on a herder.
Questions regarding reform preparation
The author notes uncertainty about whether consultations with livestock breeders have been conducted, whether their readiness has been studied, and whether the real living conditions in rural areas have been taken into account. Abdulakhatov concludes: 'If the passporting system helps the development of the industry—it is justified. But if it turns into yet another obligation and reporting requirement, it could set animal husbandry back.'
Furthermore, the expert emphasizes that simple herd accounting is not enough for the development of animal husbandry. The main task of relevant structures is not only to account for but also to create favorable conditions for herd growth, such as access to pastures, water, feed, veterinary services, and economic incentives.
In the expert's opinion, the identification system can become a valuable tool if its data is used not only to control the number of animals but also to make informed decisions on supporting the sector. Otherwise, there is a risk that the new mechanism will be perceived solely as another administrative requirement. Therefore, when further implementing it, it is crucial to consider the opinions of the livestock breeders themselves and explain the practical benefits of the new system to them.
Previously, the Ministry of Agriculture stated that the main goal of introducing new identification rules is not to impose fines, but to ensure public health, prevent the spread of dangerous diseases, and improve the quality of food products.


