In a two-and-a-half-minute video address, Prime Minister Narendra Modi focused on the trust of the country's students. Against the backdrop of ongoing dissatisfaction and protests over the leak of NEET examination materials, he clearly stated that the leak is a serious crime. He emphasized that those responsible will face severe punishment, accelerated courts will be established, and those who jeopardize the future of students will not be spared.
This was the first instance where the Prime Minister personally addressed the camera on this issue, lending his statement particular significance. The video was published around midnight, which, in the author's opinion, was a suitable moment for Generation Z audiences.
Despite the persuasiveness of the message itself, the quality of the video recording drew significant attention. Although the message aimed to strengthen trust, the way the shot was captured prevented the video from reaching its potential level of impact. When filmed on a mobile phone, the camera was positioned too close to the face, causing the face to occupy most of the frame. Furthermore, the shooting was done from a low angle, which distorted proportions: the forehead appeared smaller, and the chin appeared larger, altering the overall facial shape.
This issue relates more to general principles of filming technique than to political disagreements. Many professional photographers and content creators advise that camera positioning is critical when communicating directly with an audience. The correct angle enhances trust, whereas an incorrect one can distract the viewer. In PM Modi's video, the proximity of the mobile device emphasized appearance rather than the content of his speech.
Renowned specialists in portrait and mobile photography, such as Peter McKinnan, often recommend placing the camera at eye level or slightly above when recording selfies or videos. This approach ensures a natural look to the face and creates a sense of direct contact with the viewer. Similarly, mobile photography expert Daniel Beda advises keeping the camera about 50–70 centimeters away from the face to maintain more natural proportions, as being too close can cause distortion due to a wide-angle lens.
If PM Modi's video had been shot from about one and a half feet away and positioned at eye level or slightly higher, it would have looked much more convincing. This would have allowed for the preservation of natural facial features, showing part of the background, and focusing the viewers' attention solely on his words. The Prime Minister is experienced in public speaking, demonstrating strong facial expressions, eye contact, and intonation. However, the selfie video format differs from a podium scene because the entire responsibility for stability lies with the person holding the phone. Therefore, major world leaders often use tripods or selfie sticks for such recordings.
The slight vibration caused by filming while moving, while giving the video a casual look, could have made the message more weighty given the goal of gaining student trust. Nevertheless, the main strength of this video was its simplicity and lack of elaborate staging. When the video was posted on X, users debated whether the Prime Minister was reading from a teleprompter or genuinely addressing the students directly. Ultimately, the strongest element remained the message itself: the leak would not be considered a minor offense, and strict measures would be taken against those who play with students' futures. This message reached millions of waiting students. It should be noted that at a distance of about 60 centimeters, at eye level or slightly higher, and with greater stability, the video would have been not only powerful in content but also technically flawless as a selfie video.
During the demonstrations of the Kokrutha Janta Party (CJP) in Mumbai, which were held to protest the leak of the NEET-UG 2026 examination materials, numerous photos and video materials were actively circulated on social media. Three different video clips attracted particular attention.
The most discussed among the circulating videos was one featuring 27-year-old model Riya Ahir. This incident took place near Shivaji Park after some demonstration participants were detained. Riya Ahir approached a police vehicle and stood in front of it, refusing to move. The video shows her standing in front of a police van with both arms extended forward, holding her ground.
While the police vehicle attempted to move slowly forward, Riya remained in place. Soon, other demonstrators joined her, surrounding the police vehicle, causing it to stop. The viral videos also showed that after the demonstrators surrounded the vehicle, some detainees were allowed to leave. Mumbai Police did not issue a detailed statement regarding this entire situation.
Another video that became popular during the day was related to a completely different event. It depicted a police car transporting detained demonstrators. One of the protesters quickly ran to the police van and opened the rear latch. Subsequently, several detainees inside emerged. People nearby expressed joy and supported them.
Mumbai Police also made no comments on this matter and did not clarify the circumstances. Furthermore, not all videos were related to confrontation. A third clip drew public attention, showing demonstrators passing by a school in Dadar. In the video, children standing in the schoolyard wave at them in greeting. In response, the demonstrators also wave at the children and continue their journey. This small scene also quickly went viral on social media.
All these videos appeared during the mass CJP rallies in Mumbai, which were held against the leak of the NEET-UG 2026 exam, involving thousands of people. The Kokrutha Janta Party was founded by Abidjit Dipke and demands accountability regarding alleged irregularities in the conduct of the exams. Social activist Sonam Wangchuk is also attracting public attention with his ongoing hunger strike on this issue.
Anna Hadjare sent a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi regarding the incidents of NEET exam material leaks and the police action in Delhi against protesters. In her address, she emphasized the need for dialogue, stating: 'Do not suppress the voice of the people; negotiate.'
Hadjare believes that the resignation of anyone, even when accountability is established, will not lead to the fall of the government. She noted that millions of young people in the country suffer from issues with material leaks, unemployment, and examination delays. She advised the government to seek solutions through communication rather than suppressing movements.
Expressing concern over the plight of the youth, Anna Hadjare mentioned that 2.2 million students participated in the exams this year. Due to repeated material leaks and grading errors, 22 people committed suicide. In her view, when any mistake occurs, low-level employees are blamed, while senior management remains untouchable. She insists that leaders must take direct responsibility for mistakes, alongside acknowledging the positive aspects of the government's work.
Supporting the students and parents who have been on the streets for the last 25 days, she stated that they demand the resignation of the head of the relevant department. She clarified that someone leaving office is not a reason for the government to fall, but rather sends a clear signal to others: negligence is unacceptable. This, she said, would lead to an improvement in the administrative system if people perform their duties properly.
Anna Hadjare also raised questions regarding the events in Delhi and the forced removal of Sonam Vanchuk from a sit-in protest. She noted that despite the prolonged protests, none of the responsible representatives made an effort to talk to them. She strongly urged against dismissing the voice of the people as the voice of the opposition, reminding that the protesters are citizens of their own country.
Referencing Mahatma Gandhi's Satyagraha and constitutional values, she stressed that in a democracy, conversation is better than confrontation. Differences should be resolved with sensitivity and mutual respect. The government must restore trust between students and citizens by showing restraint.
A widespread wave of protests is currently underway regarding the NEET exam leak incident. Following an activists' march to parliament, Prime Minister Narendra Modi also made a statement on the matter today. At the same time, BJP MP Ravi Kishan is facing heavy criticism on social media for referring to the NEET exam leak as the NEET newspaper leak.
Protests against the NEET leak have been ongoing for some time at the Jantar Mantar square, organized by CJP. Consequently, Sonam Wangchuk is on hunger strike. As part of this campaign, CJP and other activists held a march of MPs yesterday, which was accompanied by serious unrest. Some users on social media are not missing an opportunity to criticize the government.
While giving comments to journalists after the parliamentary session, BJP MP Ravi Kishan made a mistake by calling the NEET exam leak incident the NEET newspaper leak. In reality, during yesterday's protests and in the context of the NEET leak, Prime Minister Narendra Modi addressed the youth and students of the country in parliament. He stated that 13 people had already been detained in this matter and emphasized that the culprits must receive the harshest punishment.
When the parliamentary session concluded and MPs began leaving the building, BJP MP Ravi Kishan was interviewed. He was asked what Prime Minister Modi had said. Ravi Kishan repeated the Prime Minister's words, adding that the best lawyer should be hired for the 13 detainees to ensure they receive the strictest possible punishment. He stated that this was necessary so that no one would dare to tamper with the future of children or leak the NEET newspaper in the future.
In doing so, Ravi Kishan confused the 'NEET exam leak' with the 'NEET newspaper leak'. He is now being mocked for this error. A video of his statement is circulating on social media. This inaccuracy was made by Ravi Kishan while answering questions at the Mangal Milan parliamentary session.
