Following growing demands from opposition parties for greater transparency, the Department of Sport, Arts and Culture (DSAC) presented a detailed report on expenditures amounting to R30,945,370.15, which were spent on South Africa's program related to the 2026 FIFA World Cup.
Program Expenditure Structure
According to the department's data, these funds covered various expense items, including official travel, legends match, hospitality suites, spectator tickets, and program activations associated with the tournament.
Official Travel Expenses
The official portion of expenses, concerning Minister Gethon Mackenzie, two support staff members, the CEO, and a 14-member project team, was estimated at R7,865,134.97. This amount included international flights, accommodation, local transport, subsistence, and operational support costs.
Calculation of Individual Costs
DSAC reported that it has not yet been possible to separate Mackenzie's personal expenses from the total costs of the entire project team, as items such as logistics, protocol, and security were purchased as a single package. The department is in the process of finalizing the breakdown of expenses per individual, which will include name, position, role, city visited, duration of stay, flight information, accommodation, transport, subsistence, and other details.
Composition of Program Participants
DSAC clarified that the World Cup program extended beyond government officials to include artists, cultural participants, football legends, media partners, sponsored fans, and project implementation teams. It was noted that not all participants traveled at the state's expense; some costs were covered by sponsorship or implementing partners.
Opposition Demands for Transparency
The Democratic Alliance and ActionSA parties continue to demand a more detailed explanation of the spending from Mackenzie. DA stated its intention to submit additional parliamentary questions and seek the minister's appearance before the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Sport, Arts and Culture. ActionSA questioned the economic viability of the expenditures, insisting on full ministerial openness regarding taxpayer spending on travel, accommodation, hospitality, and other benefits. The party also expressed concern that Mackenzie's personal expenses had not yet been separated from the overall delegation costs.