The provision of Indian consular services in the United Arab Emirates has faced delays due to a legal dispute concerning a contract, leaving many expatriates in an uncertain situation.
The Essence of the Contract Dispute
The conflict arose between two companies that failed to pass the tender process and the decision by the Government of India to award the contract for providing consular services in the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and Australia. This dispute is currently being reviewed by the Supreme Court of India.
Consequently, as of Thursday, temporary service for passport renewals and other types of services in the UAE is being provided by the Consulate General of India (CGI) in Dubai and the Embassy of India in Abu Dhabi.
History of Service Provider Transition
Earlier this year, the Embassy of India in Abu Dhabi announced the replacement of BLS, which had been handling passport, visa, and consular services for over ten years. The new contract was awarded to Alhind Tours & Travels following a competitive bidding process in November 2025. Alhind was chosen because it offered the lowest financial bid among the four companies that passed the preliminary selection.
However, the transition, originally scheduled for July 1st, was postponed by the Indian mission in the UAE citing 'administrative reasons.' In a social media post, the mission stated that it would begin providing consular services 'on a limited basis' starting July 2nd.
Allegations by Losing Participants
The two companies that failed to win the tender jointly challenged the bidding process and the decision itself in court, claiming they were disqualified 'without any stated reason.' These companies questioned the reason for exclusion during the technical evaluation stage, despite their proposals meeting all requirements. One company scored 67.5 percent in the technical evaluation, just below the threshold of 70 percent, but the company argues that the evaluation was 'arbitrary.'
In documents submitted to the court, the company provides examples of what it calls an 'explicitly arbitrary' assessment. For instance, under a criterion related to application processing times, the company was assigned zero points. Yet, the company explicitly promised to complete application processing within 30 minutes—the exact benchmark required by the tender. According to the evaluation rules, zero points should only be given if the participant proposed a processing time exceeding 30 minutes.
Similarly, the companies were given 'disproportionately low scores' on other criteria, including application assistance services, complaint resolution mechanisms, and the company's market reputation. The company asserts that it submitted 'detailed proposals' for each of these areas, but the evaluation committee 'provided no justification' for the low scores. The participant claims that the 'constant refusal to disclose reasons' renders the decision 'unfounded, non-transparent, and violating the principles of fairness and transparency.'
Status of Legal Proceedings
The case was previously heard in the High Court of Delhi, India. On June 5th, the High Court adjourned the hearing until July 13th without halting the transition. This allowed the new provider to begin taking over operations even while the legal challenge remained unresolved.
The unsuccessful participants have now approached the Supreme Court, arguing that allowing the transfer of cases before the court reviews the evaluation records will lead to 'irreversible' consequences. The company warns that once the handover is complete and application processing begins, 'contractual rights will crystallize,' and 'third-party rights will arise,' making it difficult to overturn the decision even if the court later finds the tender process flawed. Simply put, the legal challenge will become 'substantially meaningless.'
The Supreme Court had previously directed the government to provide the losing party with a breakdown of the scores received. However, the company states that the 'main reasons for disqualification remain confidential,' which violates the 'principles of transparency that should govern public procurement.'
Future Outlook
The Supreme Court is expected to review this case soon. Depending on the outcome, the implementation of consular services may continue as planned, be further delayed, or even be subject to re-evaluation.
Currently, the Indian mission in the UAE has announced limited acceptance of citizens at the point of application starting July 2nd, offering passport, visa, and legalization services based on a 'first come, first served' principle from 9:00 AM to 12:30 PM. Nevertheless, for many expatriates awaiting passport renewals, visa applications, or certificates for children's college admissions, the uncertainty is far from over.