A new law has entered into force in Uzbekistan aimed at increasing the effectiveness of the fight against corruption and ensuring accountability for crimes related to corruption. This law, adopted on June 23, 2026, introduces additional changes and amendments to a number of legal acts of the Republic of Uzbekistan.
Leadership Stance on Anti-Corruption
The President's Address noted that corruption poses a serious threat to state development, hindering the achievement of justice and the rule of law. In this regard, an 'emergency regime' was declared in 2026 to combat this problem. Despite this, the persistently high level of corruption in some sectors requires further improvement in the effectiveness of measures in this area.
Key Provisions of the New Legislation
The new law, consisting of 12 articles, amends the Codes of Criminal, Criminal Procedure, and Administrative Liability, as well as laws on state policy towards youth, anti-corruption, the Accounts Chamber of the Republic of Uzbekistan, preschool education and upbringing, education, and public procurement.
One of the most significant changes is the addition of the fourth part to Article 73 of the Criminal Code. According to this provision, the institution of conditional release does not apply to persons convicted of the most dangerous and socially disruptive crimes, as well as those who have repeatedly committed crimes or acted as intermediaries in receiving or transferring large bribes.
Stricter Penalties for Corruption
Thus, a official who used state or public funds for personal gain must serve the prescribed punishment in full and without any benefits. This norm is intended to restore the principles of justice in society and strengthen the sense of the rule of law among officials.
Furthermore, the qualification criteria for crimes related to embezzlement or misappropriation through seizure or theft are being revised, and these acts are being reclassified as more serious offenses. Articles 167 and 168 of the Criminal Code, concerning abuse of office or misuse of official position, have been moved to more severe parts, providing for imprisonment for up to 10 years.
Article 167 of the Criminal Code was also amended, where the crime committed by abusing official authority was moved to the third part of Article 167, point 'd'. Similarly, the crime of fraud committed 'using official position' was moved to point 'g' of the fourth part of Article 168 of the Criminal Code.
Elimination of Legal Contradictions
These changes significantly tighten sanctions by reclassifying relevant acts as serious crimes. A legal problem that arose when sentencing imprisonment for fraud committed without using an official position has been resolved. Previously, there was a situation where courts were forced to apply Article 57 of the Criminal Code to resolve the contradiction between sanctions and practice.
Reform in the Non-State Sector
The system for combating corruption in the non-profit sector has been fundamentally improved. Based on the recommendations of the Istanbul Roadmap for Combating Corruption, adopted by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, important additions have been made to the Criminal Code.
For officials of commercial or non-profit organizations who receive bribes, an alternative penalty of restriction of liberty for up to one year or imprisonment for up to one year is provided. Additionally, a new qualifying feature has been introduced—'if committed for selfish motives,' which allows for a clear assessment of the official's personal interest.
New Terminology and Oversight
The law uses terms such as 'corruption,' 'corruption-related offenses,' 'crimes related to corruption,' 'liability for corruption-related offenses,' and 'protection of persons providing information about corruption-related offenses.' Although the Anti-Corruption Law does not define all types of crimes related to corruption, Chapter Eight of the Criminal Code has been added to define these crimes.
Changes to the Criminal Code also required the adaptation of procedural norms of the Criminal Procedure Code, as some corruption crimes were reclassified into a more severe category. The Anti-Corruption Law strengthens mechanisms for preventing conflicts of interest and assessing corruption risks in the activities of civil servants. The powers and duties of compliance and internal anti-corruption control structures have been defined.
These structures have the right to freely visit the premises of relevant organizations and submit proposals for the dismissal or appointment of employees in case of identifying corrupt situations. The Anti-Corruption Agency has been tasked with developing a map of corruption risks in all state bodies, organizations, regions, and sectors.
Overall, the law contributes to creating an uncompromising environment against corruption, restricts the theft of state and budget funds, ensures transparency in education, youth policy, and public procurement, guaranteeing the principle of inevitable responsibility for any corruption offenses and crimes.