The Swedish judiciary decided this Wednesday, the 1st, that Google must pay Klarna the amount of US$ 1.97 billion. This determination came after the court partially concluded that the large technology company harmed competition by favoring its own price comparison service in search results.
Stockholm Court Decision
The lawsuit was initiated by PriceRunner, a platform belonging to the Swedish company. The Stockholm Patent and Market Court issued this decision, marking another setback for Google in antitrust litigation related to the European price comparison market. Although some of the claims made by PriceRunner were accepted, others were rejected.
Origin and Allegations of the Case
The case has its roots in a lawsuit filed in 2022. At that time, the company alleged that the privileged positioning given by Google to its shopping service diminished the competitiveness of rival platforms and impacted its operation in the market.
Reaction of Involved Parties
Following the deliberation, Klarna stated that the judicial verdict reinforces competition in the product and service comparison sector. Dan Greaves, a spokesperson for Klarna, declared that the decision supports a healthier and more competitive market in how consumers compare offers.
In the financial market, Klarna's shares rose approximately 5% in the first trading sessions of the day, while Google's stocks showed a slight appreciation.
Google's Stance
Google expressed its disagreement with the ruling, stating that it is analyzing the content of the decision before determining what legal measures will be taken. The company also argued that it implemented modifications to its Shopping service and ad structure in 2017, changes that, according to it, boosted the growth of price comparison platforms in Europe.
European Regulatory Context
This judgment is part of a scenario of continuous regulatory conflicts involving Google on the European continent. In 2024, the highest judicial body of the European Union ratified a previous fine of US$ 2.67 billion imposed by the bloc's antitrust authorities. These authorities had determined that the company used its dominant position in the search market to favor its shopping comparator and reduce the visibility of competitors.
Since that penalty, several European companies specializing in price comparison have filed similar lawsuits against Google, and several of these cases are still awaiting judgment in different European nations, according to data available in the text.